Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeLynchburg Virginian
Lynchburg, Virginia
What is this article about?
A letter to the editors refuting a Jackson supporter's belief that Andrew Jackson opposed federal internal improvements, presenting data from the Richmond Whig showing high expenditures under Jackson's administration compared to predecessors, urging readers not to support Van Buren blindly.
Merged-components note: The table is the extracted evidence referenced in the letter to the editor
OCR Quality
Full Text
PETERSIMPLE.
FROM THE RICHMOND WHIG.
To William H. Roane, Esq. and the People of Virginia
Sir—I think you lately said that Jackson had so crippled Internal Improvements by the Federal Government, that they could barely "hobble up" a small stream. You are either very uncandid, or very uninformed—I believe the last, for I think it more respectful to you to believe you uninformed, than to believe you capable of suppressing or misrepresenting truth.
I ask your particular attention to the following table. It is carefully compiled from the report of Levi Woodbury, (you have faith in him) Secretary of the Treasury, made to Congress on the 17th of January, 1835, in obedience to the resolution of the House of Representatives in December, calling for a statement of the Federal Expenditures from 1791 to 1833.
Compare, my dear Sir, the averages of the several Administrations as to Internal Improvements. Compare the expenditures under Gen. Jackson for that object, with any one, and with all of the previous Administrations. See how enormously his appropriations exceed all others, and then, Sir, like an honorable man, as you are, come forward and acknowledge publicly, that you were grossly deceived, and that Improvements flourish more under Gen. Jackson, than all his predecessors.
| Jefferson, 1802 to 1809 | Madison, 1810 to 1817 | Monroe, 1818 to 1825 | J. Q. Adams, 1826 to 1829 | Jackson, 1830 to 1833 | Total in each State, Territory, &c. | |
| Maine, | — | — | — | 147,176 27 | 108,177 74 | 155,354 01 |
| New Hampshire, | — | — | — | 35,529 76 | — | 35,529 76 |
| Massachusetts, | — | — | 37,019 29 | 170,322 61 | 148,397 10 | 355,739 00 |
| Rhode Island, | — | — | — | 20 00 | 30 18 | 230 18 |
| Connecticut, | — | — | — | 25,889 14 | 21,609 15 | 47,498 29 |
| New York, | — | — | 4,156 79 | 170,025 11 | 272,089 86 | 416,271 76 |
| New Jersey, | — | — | — | 100 00 | — | 100 00 |
| Pennsylvania, | — | — | 14,420 19 | 28,221 49 | 12,200 00 | 54,841 68 |
| Delaware, | — | — | — | 34,513 00 | 569,858 02 | 604,371 02 |
| Virginia, | — | — | — | 80 00 | — | 80 00 |
| North Carolina, | — | — | — | 29,840 00 | 167,733 00 | 197,573 00 |
| Georgia, | — | — | — | 7,511 68 | 10,400 00 | 17,914 68 |
| Tennessee, | — | — | — | 200 00 | 27,000 00 | 27,200 00 |
| Ohio, | — | 215,568 78 | 87,117 93 | 169,278 61 | 396,159 29 | 859,124 61 |
| Louisiana, | — | — | — | 6,435 00 | 40,118 96 | 46,553 96 |
| Indiana, | — | — | 82,748 12 | 32,319 37 | 155,398 28 | 270,465 77 |
| Mississippi, | — | — | 15,780 26 | 57,511 12 | 12,479 62 | 65,771 00 |
| Illinois, | — | 1,208 51 | 6 791 49 | 500 00 | 72,876 00 | 81,376 00 |
| Alabama, | — | — | 45,472 67 | 47,253 06 | 77,252 47 | 169,978 20 |
| Missouri, | — | — | 13,065 48 | 11,509 61 | 19,892 44 | 44,467 35 |
| Michigan, | — | — | 5,072 15 | 19,451 41 | 121,500 68 | 206,104 24 |
| Arkansas, | — | — | 3,325 82 | 44,151 38 | 73,320 85 | 120,798 05 |
| Florida, | — | — | 31,931 00 | 71,021 16 | 85,417 56 | 188,372 72 |
| Columbia District | — | — | — | — | 376,630 00 | 376,630 00 |
| Totals, | — | 216,777 24 | 346,901 19 | 1,040,045 78 | 2,768,621 20 | 1372,345 46 |
| Annual Average, | — | 27,097 16 | 43,362 65 | 260,011 44 | 692,155 30 | * |
| Cumberland Road | 14,201 90 | 659,048 30 | 1054,961 00 | 715,245 00 | 1,280,074 43 | 3,723,530 63 |
| Che & DelCanal | — | — | 193,500 00 | 257,500 00 | — | 450,000 00 |
| Dis.SwampCanal | — | — | — | 200,000 00 | — | 200,000 00 |
| Lou & Port.Canal | — | — | — | 233,500 00 | — | 233,500 00 |
| Che & O. Canal | — | — | — | 200,000 00 | 799,000 00 | 999,000 00 |
| Nav. Mississippi, | — | — | 18,272 47 | 162,043 18 | 214,197 68 | 394,513 33 |
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Letter to Editor Details
Author
Petersimple
Recipient
Messrs. Editors
Main Argument
andrew jackson supported and increased federal spending on internal improvements despite claims otherwise, as evidenced by expenditure data showing his administration's appropriations far exceeding predecessors; readers should not blindly follow to van buren.
Notable Details