Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Daily Dispatch
Editorial March 18, 1868

The Daily Dispatch

Richmond, Virginia

What is this article about?

Editorial criticizes the Senate for annoyance at being urged to convict President on partisan grounds during his trial, comparing them to hypocrites who perform partisan acts but dislike the label, referencing Wendell Phillips.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

More Afraid of the Name than the Thing.

The National Intelligencer ventures to say that every honorable man of the Senate Court, in the case now before that judicial body, feels more or less annoyance, regret, and mortification at being called upon to convict the President on partisan grounds. We have not a doubt of it. They do not like to be told the truth. They prefer that some other reason should be given. They are like the incorruptible fellow in the play, who protests with his tongue that no bribe shall ever stain his fingers, while he holds out one hand behind him to receive it. We have no doubt they consider Wendell Phillips and other plain-speaking men, who call upon them to convict the President "on partisan grounds," troublesome nuisances or addle-pated simpletons. They are willing enough to perform the work, but they would prefer a less offensive name for it.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Constitutional

What keywords are associated?

Senate Trial Partisan Conviction Presidential Impeachment Hypocrisy Wendell Phillips

What entities or persons were involved?

National Intelligencer Senate Court President Wendell Phillips

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Senate's Reluctance To Convict President On Partisan Grounds

Stance / Tone

Critical And Satirical Of Senate Hypocrisy

Key Figures

National Intelligencer Senate Court President Wendell Phillips

Key Arguments

Senators Feel Annoyance At Being Called To Convict On Partisan Grounds They Dislike The Truth And Prefer Other Reasons Comparison To Hypocrite Accepting Bribe While Protesting Integrity View Plain Speakers Like Phillips As Nuisances Willing To Do The Work But Want A Less Offensive Name

Are you sure?