Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Daily American Organ
Story October 6, 1856

Daily American Organ

Washington, District Of Columbia

What is this article about?

In the Seventh ward, Mr. Ballenger continued cleaning privies after his appointment, despite Mr. Mullen's unconfirmed role. Mullen sued Ballenger, but courts ruled in Ballenger's favor. A later suit was refused to avoid corporate expense, affirming citizens' right to hire cleaners.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

The Scavengers. Mr. Ballenger, the old scavenger of the Seventh ward, having been solicited by the people of the ward to continue to clean their privies, (the appointment of Mr. Mullen not having been confirmed) proceeded to do so. This, Mr. Mullen considered an infringement of his rights, and in order to test the matter brought suit against Ballenger. The cases were tried and decided in favor of defendants. We understand that since the decision, another suit was brought against the same party, which the Magistrate refused to try, saying that it was putting the Corporation to unnecessary expense. Three suits had already been decided at the expense of the Corporation, and he would not consent to try another—that he did not consider him an officer of the Corporation, and should not do so until his appointment was confirmed. A citizen can employ whom he pleases to clean his premises, provided the person so employed, deposits the refuse in the place provided by law for its reception.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Curiosity

What themes does it cover?

Justice

What keywords are associated?

Scavenger Dispute Privy Cleaning Court Cases Seventh Ward Municipal Rights

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Ballenger Mr. Mullen

Where did it happen?

Seventh Ward

Story Details

Key Persons

Mr. Ballenger Mr. Mullen

Location

Seventh Ward

Story Details

Mr. Ballenger continues cleaning privies in the Seventh ward despite Mr. Mullen's unconfirmed appointment, leading to lawsuits decided in Ballenger's favor; a third suit is refused to avoid expense, upholding citizens' hiring rights.

Are you sure?