Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Alexandria Gazette
Domestic News January 14, 1840

Alexandria Gazette

Alexandria, Alexandria County, District Of Columbia

What is this article about?

A January 1810 letter from Washington reports a dull day in Congress, highlighted by Mr. Botts demanding an explanation from Mr. Smith of Maine over prior inflammatory remarks about General Jackson, resulting in Mr. Smith's retraction framing it as an 'honest difference of opinion.' Similar absurd parliamentary clarifications noted, including Mr. Bynum's on calling Mr. Stanly a 'political champion.'

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Extract of a letter, dated 11, 1810.

WASHINGTON, Jan.

This has been a dull, prosy day in Congress—with the exception of a demand upon Mr. Smith, of Me., by Mr. Botts, of Va. Mr. Smith—backed out of his previous day's violent harangue. These parliamentary explanations are getting to be very ridiculous. Now, the other day Mr. Bynum stigmatised Mr. Stanly as a "bully"—Being called upon for an "explanation" he said he meant "political champion." Mr. Smith said that Mr. Botts had called General Jackson a "tyrant"—that the assertion was a false slander—and would be branded on the forehead of the calumniator. That by "foul slander" he meant "an honest difference of opinion"—and by the rest of the sentence, that "history would determine who was right!" This is truly using words in the Pickwickian sense.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Congress Debate Parliamentary Explanations General Jackson Tyrant Accusation Pickwickian Sense

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Smith Of Me. Mr. Botts Of Va. Mr. Bynum Mr. Stanly General Jackson

Where did it happen?

Washington

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Washington

Event Date

Jan. 1810

Key Persons

Mr. Smith Of Me. Mr. Botts Of Va. Mr. Bynum Mr. Stanly General Jackson

Outcome

mr. smith retracted his statements, explaining 'foul slander' as 'honest difference of opinion' and deferring judgment to history; similar explanations deemed ridiculous.

Event Details

Dull day in Congress except for Mr. Botts demanding explanation from Mr. Smith over previous violent harangue accusing Mr. Botts of slandering General Jackson as a tyrant. Mr. Smith backed out, rephrasing his words in a Pickwickian sense. Referenced prior incident where Mr. Bynum explained calling Mr. Stanly a 'bully' as meaning 'political champion.'

Are you sure?