Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeAlexandria Gazette & Daily Advertiser
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
In Richmond, the hustings court ruled in favor of a colored man accused of exhibiting a faro table, discharging him as he did not actually play; two others were sent for further trial after an informer's tip on illegal gambling.
OCR Quality
Full Text
A case of some little nicety, touching the application of a point of law to testimony, was brought before the hustings court of this city, on Monday last. Some weeks since, certain persons of colour had been playing faro; and one of them, who had lost by the game, turned informer, and called upon the police, who took the person charged with exhibiting the table into custody. Three were brought before the Hustings Court on Monday; and when the first case of a respectable coloured man was called up, it appeared from the evidence, that after two had exhibited the table, playing with the company, he, finding he was losing, said he would try his luck, and accordingly seated himself at the table, laid his money before him, took hold of the cards, and invited his companions to bet. It appeared, however, that none of them did actually bet, that he did not turn a card, and that of course he did not play in the character of an exhibitor. The Act of Assembly declares that the keeper or exhibitor of a faro table is guilty of a high misdemeanor. The question was, whether this man was an exhibitor, or not, in the eye of the law. His counsel contended that he was not; that he must not only be ready to play, but must actually play, to constitute the offence. The Court decided in the man's favour—and he was accordingly discharged.
The next day, the other two men were sent on for further trial.
[Compiler.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Richmond
Event Date
Monday Last
Outcome
respectable coloured man discharged; other two men sent for further trial.
Event Details
Certain persons of colour played faro; one turned informer leading to arrest of exhibitor. Three brought before Hustings Court. Evidence showed the first man seated at table, laid money, took cards, invited bets but no one bet and he did not turn a card. Court ruled he was not an exhibitor under the Act of Assembly and discharged him.