Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeGazette Of The United States, & Philadelphia Daily Advertiser
Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania
What is this article about?
An address to grand jurors in Pennsylvania urges enforcement of the law against land intruders in the Wyoming Valley, citing the final 1782 Trenton decree favoring Pennsylvania over Connecticut claims. It warns against schemes for a separate state, predicting federal opposition and national unity against such anarchy.
Merged-components note: These two components continue the same editorial piece on intrusions and land laws in Pennsylvania; bounding box overlap in y-coordinates indicates continuation.
OCR Quality
Full Text
highly criminal; and the persons concerned therein as
principal, or accessory, are liable on conviction, to
heavy fines and imprisonment.
This law may be said to owe its existence to the high
court of commissioners which sat under the constitution
of the United States, at Trenton, in the year
1782, and which, on a hearing between Pennsylvania
and Connecticut, touching the question of boundary,
solemnly decided in favor of the former state. In
pursuance of powers vested in Congress by the old
confederation, they were declared to be "the last resort in all disputes between states concerning boundary
of
regularly made to that body, and judges appointed
or jurisdiction." Under this clause, the appeal was
agreeably to the directions of the constitution, who
after a full hearing, finally pronounced an unanimous
judgment, in behalf of the Pennsylvania claim. The
act again intrudes land speculators.
it: -
.cif of anun.
PZ
doubted right, confirmed and ascertained by the de-
cision then given, and which it is utterly impossible
Pennsylvania should ever relinquish.
Some persons have indeed entertained an idea,
that the individuals whose interest was affected by the
decree at Trenton, have a right to a second trial be-
fore Congress, on the question of soil, or private title
18
between citizen and citizen. To my apprehension it
clause, will warrant any such inference. It contemplates
does not appear, that the genuine construction of the
states may have adjusted the question of jurisdiction,
places merely a special law, viz. that where any two
=H
as far as respects the lands claimed by them, and the
grants to the lands are claimed to have originated pre-
vious to the settlement of the question of jurisdiction
P
between them—that in this case, there may be a trial
before Congress, concerning the private right of soil,
to be determined in the same manner, they might have
on the petition of either party (or state) which shall
had the question of boundary decided on appeal to
Congress.
Other persons, I well know, are propagating a
still more visionary scheme, of a second trial, on the
merits of the original controversy. In the ordinary
cases of private property, the laws recognize a right
to a second trial, under certain circumstances, and
therefore it may be had. But in the case of a great
national question, it is both trifling and ridiculous to
talk of it; more especially as the constitution, in con-
formity to which the trial hath been had, explicitly de-
clares the judgment of the commissioners shall be "fi-
nal and conclusive."
But perhaps you will say, why are these obser-
vations made now, and why are we at this time, called
upon to execute the act against intruders?
I answer you candidly, gentlemen. Very alarm-
ing reports are every where spread, and have reached
the government, of surveys made by men in arms—
of whole townships being laid off under an assumed
authority—and that a land office has been opened in
the county, for the avowed purpose of granting war-
rants and disposing of lands, in direct opposition to
the laws and government of Pennsylvania.
These are high charges, and of very serious im-
port; and there is too much reason to believe that there
are those amongst us, of desperate character and views,
who are fatally bent upon the mad scheme of a sepa-
rate state: and t attain their object, scruple not the
use of means which invariably lead to war and blood-
shed.
I beseech you, gentlemen, to consider cooly,
whither these measures tend. We will venture to
calculate, without the spirit o prophecy, what will
be the result, in spite of the sanguine projects of a
few deluded state speculators.
It is impossible to believe, for a moment, that
there is o little Sense and virtue in Congress, as to
suffer an enterprize like this to succeed.Every
member of that body, cannot but see, that what
happens here to-day, may happen elsewhere to-mor-
row ; and therefore we may be confident, they will
unanimously set their faces against the present law.
lesattempt to form a separate state. Should they
quietly give way to violence and usurpation here,
similar schemes will, doubtless de pursued in other
places, and our country warm with projectors,
who will ocn fritter it into as many divisions and
ub-divisions as ambition or avarice may devise.r A
common eue of danger will therefore unite all
Dats of the union against you. If the wetern in-
Fnrection was ubdued a few years ago, by the
pirited exertions of the people in upport of law
and liberty, how ean others latter thernelves with
hopes of ucces, and between whom there is this
difference? They had rien in oppoition to a law,
by many eeemed odious, and dangerous to free-
dom. But you are forming a projeet to eize the
property of other persons; an enterprize ininitely
mischievous, and which can have no advocates, ex-
cept the pattizaus of anarchy and plunder.
-It is truc, gentlemen, we goifeis very calight-
ened ideas of government, and boat much of our
republican vircue, and we are not paring in our
abue and contempt of monarchical conltitutions.
But what iguifv thee things, if they are not uf.
fi ient to induce us to ubmit to governments of our
own muking, and rulers of our own chooing ? Re-
publicans who openly oppoe themselves to the de-
erees of the upreme authority of the nation, are a
diggrace to the name and eharaCter The king of
Great. Britaio, in his ir peech to Parliament, af.
tery acknowledging our independence, dared to
prophecy, that our republiean government would be
of hort duration, and hat we should oon be glad
to exchange it for a limited monarchy. Take care,
gentlemen, that by your conduct you do not render
youelves the undeigning intruments of aecomp-
lihing, in part, this prediction. For reft a ured,
no position in the hitory of politics is more unque.
tionably true, :han that if mankind cannot find their
property protected under one form of government,
they will have recourfe to ome other that pofees
more energy and vigor.
Finally, gentlemen, your own immediate concern,
and the interet you have in common, with the other
parts of the tate, call loudly on you at this important
moment, to dicharge your duty as grand jurors, with
firmnes and integrity.. You are under the acred ob-
ligations of an oath, that you will diligently enquire
and true preentment make of all uch matters which
hall be given you in cbarge. And in order that your
attention may be the more pointedly turned to the ub-
ject, the court does in this public and olemn manner,
give the ait againk intruion in charge to you; and we
expecl, as you value your own happines, and the prof-
perity of our country, you will triclly and honeftly
preent every violation of this law. that may have fal-
len within the compas of your knowledge."
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Enforcement Of Pennsylvania Law Against Land Intruders Following 1782 Trenton Decree
Stance / Tone
Strongly Supportive Of Pennsylvania's Jurisdiction And Warning Against Separate State Schemes
Key Figures
Key Arguments