Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Atlanta Daily World
Domestic News July 20, 1952

Atlanta Daily World

Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

What is this article about?

The NAACP asked President Truman to veto H.R. 1758, extending the D.C. unlawful entry statute to public buildings, arguing it could be used against those working to end segregation in D.C. schools and playgrounds.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Ask Truman To Veto D.C. Entry Statute

WASHINGTON-The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People this week asked President Truman to veto H R. 1758, an extension of the unlawful entry statute of the District of Columbia to include public as well as private buildings on grounds that it might be used against persons who are working to end segregation in schools and playgrounds in the District of Columbia.

Clarence Mitchell, director of the NAACP Washington Bureau, wrote the President that the bill, which was introduced for the avowed purpose of curbing vandalism in public schools, "is broad enough to permit its use" against persons who in a lawful and orderly manner are seeking to end segregation." in the District's schools and playgrounds. "There is a strong possibility," the NAACP executive said, "that some arbitrary official of the District would use the bill, if it became law, to deny access to schools and playgrounds even to those in search of information necessary for court action."

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Naacp Veto Request Truman Dc Entry Statute Segregation Schools Clarence Mitchell

What entities or persons were involved?

President Truman Clarence Mitchell

Where did it happen?

Washington

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Washington

Event Date

This Week

Key Persons

President Truman Clarence Mitchell

Event Details

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People asked President Truman to veto H R. 1758, an extension of the unlawful entry statute of the District of Columbia to include public as well as private buildings, on grounds that it might be used against persons working to end segregation in schools and playgrounds. Clarence Mitchell wrote that the bill is broad enough to permit its use against those seeking to end segregation in a lawful manner, and that arbitrary officials might deny access even for court action information.

Are you sure?