Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Weekly Pelican
Editorial March 9, 1889

The Weekly Pelican

New Orleans, Orleans County, Louisiana

What is this article about?

Editorial supporting protective tariffs, praising President Harrison's arguments and criticizing Cleveland's free trade views, noting Louisiana planters' need for protection despite voting Democratic; critiques Mills bill for shifting duties without consumer benefit.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

SOUND FOR PROTECTION.

No sugar or rice planter of Louisiana can compare the clearly expressed, emphatic and conclusive protection arguments of President Harrison with Mr. Cleveland's pessimistic homily on the burdens imposed by the tariff on consumers without rejoicing in the great political defeat of his party. For, be it known, nearly every planter in Louisiana is so dominated and terrorized by the bulldozing politicians that he dare not vote anything but the straight Democratic ticket. There is left to these men, placed in a peculiar position, who have not the courage of their convictions, the somewhat doubtful comfort of knowing that their co-laborers in other States had either better sense or more courage than themselves. They must have protection for their products or ruin will overtake them; yet they join themselves with and vote for the nominees of the free trade party and applaud their congressmen for joining with the representatives of that party in restricting the great American protective system to a mere local issue. This is the only construction the Mills bill is possibly susceptible of, for it took the duty off wool, salt, lumber and some other things to add it to sugar. The flimsy pretense for this tentative step towards perfect free trade was the desire to cheapen articles of necessity to consumers. Now there is not a family in the land which uses wool, salt and lumber that does not use sugar likewise. What benefit can it be to such to take the duty off one thing and immediately clap it onto another? It happens that the man who raises wool or makes lumber or salt does not raise sugar. These non-protected interests would therefore be seriously crippled without benefit to a single consumer, as the people must pay the government expenses in any case, and that is all it is proposed to collect. President Harrison's policy would make the people prosperous so they would be able to pay for American products, while Mr. Cleveland assumed they would remain poor, and hence the necessity to provide a condition that would enable them to buy cheap foreign goods, and thus drain the country of its money.

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Policy Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Protective Tariffs Free Trade Louisiana Planters Mills Bill Harrison Policy Cleveland Views

What entities or persons were involved?

President Harrison Mr. Cleveland Louisiana Planters Democratic Party Mills Bill

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Support For Protective Tariffs Against Democratic Free Trade Policies

Stance / Tone

Pro Protectionism, Critical Of Free Trade And Democratic Influence On Louisiana Planters

Key Figures

President Harrison Mr. Cleveland Louisiana Planters Democratic Party Mills Bill

Key Arguments

Louisiana Sugar And Rice Planters Need Protection But Are Coerced To Vote Democratic Mills Bill Shifts Duties From Wool, Salt, Lumber To Sugar Without Benefiting Consumers Protective Tariffs Promote Prosperity And Ability To Buy American Products Free Trade Policies Assume And Perpetuate Poverty, Draining Money Abroad

Are you sure?