Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeVirginia Argus
Richmond, Virginia
What is this article about?
American commentary contrasts Halifax account of HMS Little Belt engagement with Commodore Rodgers' official statement from USS President, accusing Capt. Bingham of lacking candor and honor, defending U.S. actions as polite and justified. Baltimore's Federal Republican criticizes Rodgers' conduct as lawless and cowardly.
OCR Quality
Full Text
' No greatness is equal to that of concession where greatness of power remains''The American frigate, had " sheered off." "In the morning she bore down upon the Little Belt and asked her permission to send a boat to her, which was granted." The language of Com. Rodgers is," I sent a boat with Lieut. Creighton, to ascertain her name and that of her commander, the damages," &c.-We have no doubt that on this occasion Commodore Rodgers acted with the politeness of a gentleman ; but not with the condescension of an offending inferior.
The Federal Republican of Baltimore, after giving the account from Halifax, adds- " Viewing all the circumstances of this transaction, we cannot see any thing to justify the conduct of Com. Rodgers, but consider it as lawless, unprincipled, and cowardly in the extreme."—ib.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
East Of The Chesapeake
Key Persons
Outcome
engagement lasted about ten minutes; british account claims three quarters of an hour; u.s. frigate ceased firing and sheered off.
Event Details
Commentary contrasts British account from Halifax of HMS Little Belt chasing and engaging USS President with Commodore Rodgers' statement, accusing Capt. Bingham of dishonesty; defends U.S. actions as initiated by British fire after identification; post-engagement, U.S. sent boat to assess damages politely.