Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
August 28, 1852
The North Carolinian
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
What is this article about?
The Supreme Court of New Hampshire rules that correspondence between unmarried individuals of opposite sexes implies matrimonial intent, cautioning against non-matrimonial letter-writing to avoid legal implications.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
CAUTION TO LETTER-WRITERS.--The Supreme Court of New Hampshire has given a judicial exposition of the law on the subject of love letters, by instructing a jury, in a recent case, that where a written correspondence is kept up between an unmarried gentleman and an unmarried young lady, of suitable age, who is not his relative, the most common and natural inference is, that it is upon matrimonial subjects. Young marriageable ladies, at least prudent ones, do not allow themselves to be engaged in a correspondence with unmarried men, unless they suppose a marriage contract exists between them. And unmarried men do not desire that such a correspondence should be carried on where an engagement does not exist, unless it be from some improper motives, or with the hope and expectation of an ultimate engagement. If these instructions are to be taken as law in other States, all sentimentalities, not looking to matrimonial conclusions, between unmarried persons of opposite sexes, will have to assume an oral character.
What sub-type of article is it?
Curiosity
Historical Event
What themes does it cover?
Social Manners
Moral Virtue
What keywords are associated?
Love Letters
Court Ruling
Matrimonial Intent
Correspondence Caution
Unmarried Engagement
Where did it happen?
New Hampshire
Story Details
Location
New Hampshire
Event Date
Recent Case
Story Details
Supreme Court instructs jury that love letters between unmarried persons imply matrimonial intent, cautioning against non-engagement correspondence due to legal inferences of contract or improper motives.