Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Western Democrat
Story November 13, 1860

The Western Democrat

Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

What is this article about?

Dr. Tucker of the Medical Journal dismisses bran and rye bread as ineffective remedies for dyspepsia, citing their irritant effects on weakened stomachs, and endorses cold, stale wheat bread as superior.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Dyspepsia And Its Supposed Remedies.—Dr. Tucker, of the Medical Journal, has no faith in bran bread, rye bread, &c., as remedies in dyspepsia. They are commonly supposed to exert a good feeling by keeping the bowels open by their mechanical effect of irritation, but it is an absurd idea to give indigestible bran to a stomach already weakened, and whose complaint is that it cannot digest. Bran and other mechanical irritants, though they may relieve the constipation, are not remedial, and only afford a present relief of one symptom, purchased at the risk of aggravating the real difficulty

Dr. Tucker believes that cold and stale wheat bread is the most digestible, and, therefore, the best.

What sub-type of article is it?

Medical Curiosity

What themes does it cover?

Recovery Moral Virtue

What keywords are associated?

Dyspepsia Remedies Bran Bread Critique Wheat Bread Recommendation

What entities or persons were involved?

Dr. Tucker

Story Details

Key Persons

Dr. Tucker

Story Details

Dr. Tucker argues against using bran bread and rye bread for dyspepsia, as they irritate a weakened stomach without addressing the core issue, and recommends cold, stale wheat bread as the most digestible option.

Are you sure?