Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger
Story August 11, 1806

Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger

Norfolk, Virginia

What is this article about?

Reports on the removal of U.S. Marshal Samuel Swartwout after his testimony in a New York trial related to the Miranda affair, which was favorable to the government. Questions arise about possible political retaliation, while a response defends against accusations of jury tampering in trials of Smith and Ogden.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Equal and exact justice.—We are informed that on the late trial in New York, the testimony of Mr. Swartwout, the marshal of the district, was of a nature to make favourable impressions as to the agency of government in the affair of Miranda, and that since the conclusion of the trial he has been removed from his office by the president of the United States.

In the name of morality and decency, is it possible that there should be any connexion between these two facts! Will the administration leave room for even a suspicion that an officer under oath before a court of justice must accommodate his testimony to their wishes at the peril of his office. We greatly fear that there is something rotten in this affair.

(U. S. Gaz.)

MARSHAL SWARTWOUT.—It is reported, but we know nothing of the truth of the report, that the President of the United States has removed Mr. Swartwout from the office of Marshal of this district.

It is sneeringly intimated in the Evening Post of Saturday last, that the removal ought to have been made, if made at all, previous to the late trials of Smith and Ogden, in which case Mr. Coleman seems to intimate that the marshal would not have had use in his power to select a jury to answer certain purposes. As Mr. Coleman, and the heads of the federal party, and the friends of our excellent and incorrupt governor, and the marshal, etc. have acted all together on this occasion, he may be presumed to know something about it. There never was on any occasion, or at any time a more profligate, a more audacious, or a more unprincipled combination to calumniate the National Executive, and embarrass the operations of Government.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Mystery

What themes does it cover?

Justice Deception

What keywords are associated?

Marshal Removal Miranda Affair Political Interference Jury Selection Federal Party

What entities or persons were involved?

Swartwout Miranda Smith Ogden Coleman

Where did it happen?

New York

Story Details

Key Persons

Swartwout Miranda Smith Ogden Coleman

Location

New York

Story Details

Testimony of Marshal Swartwout in New York trial on Miranda affair favorably portrayed government agency, followed by his removal by the president, prompting suspicions of connection and political pressure on testimony. Report defends against Evening Post insinuations of delayed removal to influence jury selection in Smith and Ogden trials, accusing critics of calumniating the executive.

Are you sure?