Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Augusta Courier
Editorial October 23, 1961

The Augusta Courier

Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia

What is this article about?

Editorial by Roy V. Harris praises parents' boycott of integrated New Orleans schools, criticizes a 'Declaration of Principles' by business leaders supporting compliance with federal orders, and accuses pro-integration figures of undermining segregation. Highlights Mississippi's resistance and condemns enforced 'peace' by police.

Merged-components note: Merged continuation of the 'STRICTLY PERSONAL' editorial column by Roy V. Harris on school integration boycott and related issues from page 1 to page 3; further continuation appears in a separate component on page 4.

Clippings

1 of 2

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

STRICTLY PERSONAL
By ROY V. HARRIS

The South Louisiana Citizens' Council recently ran a quarter-page ad in the New Orleans TIMES-PICAYUNE as "An Important Message for Parents!" an article entitled. "THE BOYCOTT Your Key to Freedom.

The full text of this ad follows:

INTEGRATION IN NEW ORLEANS SCHOOLS last year was a magnificent failure.

Parents of children in Frantz and McDonough No. 19 saw to it that the Federal Government's attempt to forcibly integrate these schools, in violation of Louisiana segregation laws, was roundly defeated.

Every white child was withdrawn from McDonogh No. 19, attended by three Negroes, while only a dozen or so children trickled into Frantz with one Negro. Our hats go off to these patriotic parents who so effectively boycotted these two schools.

Just before the opening of school this year, some civic and business leaders mounted a campaign designed to suppress righteous objections of the planned invasion of their schools by the Federal government.

We ask that you not be misled by the aberrations of these leaders, particularly the 300 business people who signed a so-called "Declaration of Principles" published in the newspapers August 31. This actually was a "Declaration For The Surrender of Principles." It called for compliance with federal court orders and the preservation of public school education (even though integrated). It called for a Constitutional amendment (a real sleeper) to uphold state control of education, and it stressed law and order and dignity for the benefit of world opinion, (whatever that is).

We were appalled that some of the signers who have been on the side of segregation would support such a "Declaration" which, in effect, asks the citizens to surrender their most precious right, their voice to speak out against injustice, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

These signers should know that freedom cannot be preserved by surrendering freedom. Besides, the people of Louisiana do not contend that the Constitution is objectionable. They stand upon it. What they do contend is that Federal court decisions have distorted the meaning of the Constitution.

While an amendment may be proposed to strengthen the Constitution's position, it may take a hundred years to fulfill-too late to prevent destruction of the public school system by the Federal judiciary and the active processes of degeneration and mongrelization of our progeny.

300 Business People are Segregated

These signers dwell in an ivory tower, live in a highly segregated society, send their children to segregated schools, and a majority of them belong to exclusive, segregated social clubs. Obviously, they have no intention of enrolling their children in integrated public schools.

Why, then, do they ask others—those who are less fortunate financially-to sacrifice their children to the race mixers.

All who signed the so-called "Declaration of Principles" are not on the side of segregation, and none have taken an active part to preserve segregation,

Rabbi Julian B. Feibelman, and Episcopal Bishop Girault

(Continued on Page 3)
STRICTLY PERSONAL

(Continued from Page I)

Jones are co-chairmen of Save Our Schools, a pro-integration organization that was exposed by this Council in The Times-Picayune, August 17, 1960, as having several directors who are connected with groups sympathetic to leftwing causes. For example, Rabbi Feibelman submitted a petition to the New Orleans Parish School Board on September 12, 1955, calling for immediate school integration and then on December 6, 1955, requested use of Rabouin school auditorium for a Forum to have been sponsored by the Southern Conference Educational Fund, which was termed a suspect Communist front by the School Board.

Others who are not on the side of segregation are Joseph M. Jones, chairman of the Tulane University Educational Fund, which on April 12 announced that Tulane would admit qualified students regardless of race or color if it were "legally permissible;" Ralph M. Pons, who has circulated through the mails free copies of Father Robert Guste's pro-integration booklet, "For Men of Good Will," and Charles G. Smither, who as chairman of the New Orleans Public Library Board, cooperated with former Mayor deLesseps S. Morrison in integrating the New Orleans public library without any court order whatsoever.

"How would you feel," the Shreveport Journal asked in a lead editorial September 11, "if the next pay envelope you received- contained a notice from your employer that your job would be endangered unless you submitted peacefully to racial integration for your children?"

This is exactly what happened to an "untold number of Dallas employees" last week, the Journal said. "At least one resentful Dallasite, employed by a major company, has furnished us with copies of the notices, the Journal explained, adding that at the bottom of each was this shocking revelation: Produced in consultation with the Greater Dallas Council of Churches, the Dallas Bar Association and the Dallas County Medical Society.'

On the other hand, the State of Mississippi is not being pressured by the Federal courts to integrate her schools because her rich and poor, her city and country citizens are united in their determination to preserve racial integrity, no matter what it costs, and Mississippi will succeed.

New accounts are giving the impression that because school mixing has been "peaceful," it is being accepted. Not so. The "peace" they are talking about is the fraudulent "peace" enforced by New Orleans police assigned in effect to Federal duty.

Some policemen balked at such a distasteful assignment, we are told.

This is "peace" by bayonet. It is the same kind of "peace" the Russians meted out to the Hungarians. It

What sub-type of article is it?

Education Constitutional Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

School Integration Segregation Boycott New Orleans Schools Federal Courts Declaration Of Principles Racial Integrity Constitutional Rights Pro Segregation

What entities or persons were involved?

South Louisiana Citizens' Council Roy V. Harris 300 Business People Rabbi Julian B. Feibelman Episcopal Bishop Girault Jones Save Our Schools Joseph M. Jones Ralph M. Pons Charles G. Smither Delesseps S. Morrison Federal Government New Orleans Parish School Board

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Opposition To School Integration In New Orleans

Stance / Tone

Strongly Pro Segregation And Anti Federal Intervention

Key Figures

South Louisiana Citizens' Council Roy V. Harris 300 Business People Rabbi Julian B. Feibelman Episcopal Bishop Girault Jones Save Our Schools Joseph M. Jones Ralph M. Pons Charles G. Smither Delesseps S. Morrison Federal Government New Orleans Parish School Board

Key Arguments

Integration In Frantz And Mcdonough No. 19 Schools Failed Due To Effective White Boycotts Declaration Of Principles Is A Surrender To Federal Court Orders Signers Hypocritically Support Integration While Living Segregated Lives Federal Courts Distort The Constitution's Meaning Constitutional Amendment Too Slow To Prevent School Destruction Pro Integration Leaders Linked To Leftwing Causes Employer Threats In Dallas Coerce Acceptance Of Integration Mississippi Succeeds In Resisting Integration Through Unity Enforced 'Peace' In New Orleans Akin To Soviet Suppression

Are you sure?