Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
October 23, 1813
Daily National Intelligencer
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
The editorial critiques the prejudice of applauding military valor only when victorious, arguing it is unjust. It praises the greater glory of Captain Lawrence in death and Major Beasley's courageous defense against a Creek attack, where bravery shone despite defeat.
Clipping
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
Prejudice induces us to yield unreserved applause to valor when victorious, but it restrains us from loud encomiums upon valor unattended by success—this is a distinction as cruel as it is unjust. The glory of Lawrence when slain, was perhaps greater than that he had previously acquired—so the courage and devotion of major Beasley, and of his officers, during the attack made upon them by the Creeks, could not have been increased by a victory, they were rendered even more conspicuous by the fall of these brave men.
ib.
ib.
What sub-type of article is it?
Military Affairs
Moral Or Religious
What keywords are associated?
Military Valor
Valor In Defeat
Creek Attack
Major Beasley
Captain Lawrence
What entities or persons were involved?
Lawrence
Major Beasley
His Officers
Creeks
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Praise For Valor In Defeat Against Creeks
Stance / Tone
Defense Of Recognizing Courage Regardless Of Victory
Key Figures
Lawrence
Major Beasley
His Officers
Creeks
Key Arguments
Prejudice Limits Applause To Victorious Valor, Which Is Cruel And Unjust
Lawrence's Glory Increased By His Death
Beasley's Courage And Devotion Conspicuous Despite Defeat By Creeks
Bravery Of Fallen Soldiers Shines Brighter