Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
January 5, 1850
The Ottawa Free Trader
Ottawa, La Salle County County, Illinois
What is this article about?
Editorial commentary on Dr. Webster's trial, emphasizing that the jury's verdict on an unexplained violent act should not prejudice public opinion, advocating fairness for guilt or innocence.
Clipping
OCR Quality
100%
Excellent
Full Text
In case it is not known even that any defence was attempted by Dr. Webster. It is obvious, therefore, that the verdict of the jury can be regarded only as indicating that circumstances which are unexplained may admit of an explanation, furnish evidence satisfactory to the jury that the deed of violence was committed by the accused.
We make these remarks with a view of keeping the public mind unprejudiced, so far as in our power lies. If Dr. Webster is guilty, we entertain no fear that he will not receive his deserts. If innocent, he is entitled to an impartial, and to a fair hearing before the tribunal of public opinion.
We make these remarks with a view of keeping the public mind unprejudiced, so far as in our power lies. If Dr. Webster is guilty, we entertain no fear that he will not receive his deserts. If innocent, he is entitled to an impartial, and to a fair hearing before the tribunal of public opinion.
What sub-type of article is it?
Crime Story
Historical Event
What themes does it cover?
Justice
Crime Punishment
What keywords are associated?
Dr Webster
Trial Verdict
Jury Decision
Public Opinion
Unexplained Circumstances
What entities or persons were involved?
Dr. Webster
Story Details
Key Persons
Dr. Webster
Story Details
Commentary on the jury's verdict in Dr. Webster's trial for a violent deed, noting unexplained circumstances and urging an unprejudiced public opinion to ensure fair treatment whether guilty or innocent.