Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
May 20, 1848
Boon's Lick Times
Fayette, Howard County, Missouri
What is this article about?
Hon. Geo. Rathbun denounces Gen. Cass in Utica convention for shifting on slavery exclusion. Cass publishes Rathbun's 1846 letter praising him. Rathbun explains change via Benedict Arnold analogy, condemning Cass's inconsistency.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
From the New York Tribune.
Hon. Geo. Rathbun, a leading barnburner of our State, having, in the late State Convention at Utica, denounced Gen. Cass as utterly unworthy of support, Gen. C. publishes part of a letter written him in September, '46, by Mr. R., which expressed the highest esteem and regard. Mr. Rathbun explained that when said letter was written, Gen. Cass was openly, notoriously, warmly in favor excluding slavery from any territory which we might acquire from Mexico, and that the letter published by Gen. C. was impelled by a knowledge of that fact. He illustrates:
Benedict Arnold was at one time a brave soldier; he was believed to be a true patriot. He rose to the rank of General in the army of the Colonies; fought bravely in defence of the rights of the American people-was esteemed worthy and honest. The American people became attached to him, praised him, flattered him, yet when he went on board of the Vulture and deserted to the British army, and accepted office under the British Crown, he was detested by every honest man of all parties. So far as I know, he never published parts of letters written to him before his desertion, to prove the inconsistency of his friends while he appeared an honest man, because they condemned him when he had demonstrated that he was no longer honest, or worthy of confidence.
Hon. Geo. Rathbun, a leading barnburner of our State, having, in the late State Convention at Utica, denounced Gen. Cass as utterly unworthy of support, Gen. C. publishes part of a letter written him in September, '46, by Mr. R., which expressed the highest esteem and regard. Mr. Rathbun explained that when said letter was written, Gen. Cass was openly, notoriously, warmly in favor excluding slavery from any territory which we might acquire from Mexico, and that the letter published by Gen. C. was impelled by a knowledge of that fact. He illustrates:
Benedict Arnold was at one time a brave soldier; he was believed to be a true patriot. He rose to the rank of General in the army of the Colonies; fought bravely in defence of the rights of the American people-was esteemed worthy and honest. The American people became attached to him, praised him, flattered him, yet when he went on board of the Vulture and deserted to the British army, and accepted office under the British Crown, he was detested by every honest man of all parties. So far as I know, he never published parts of letters written to him before his desertion, to prove the inconsistency of his friends while he appeared an honest man, because they condemned him when he had demonstrated that he was no longer honest, or worthy of confidence.
What sub-type of article is it?
Biography
Historical Event
What themes does it cover?
Deception
Betrayal
Justice
What keywords are associated?
Political Denunciation
Slavery Exclusion
Benedict Arnold Analogy
Letter Publication
Party Inconsistency
What entities or persons were involved?
Hon. Geo. Rathbun
Gen. Cass
Benedict Arnold
Where did it happen?
Utica
Story Details
Key Persons
Hon. Geo. Rathbun
Gen. Cass
Benedict Arnold
Location
Utica
Event Date
September 1846
Story Details
Rathbun denounces Cass for changing stance on slavery exclusion from Mexican territory; Cass counters with old praising letter; Rathbun analogizes to Benedict Arnold's treason, arguing condemnation follows betrayal.