Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Virginia Argus
Editorial April 5, 1813

Virginia Argus

Richmond, Virginia

What is this article about?

Editorial satirically defends Massachusetts Republican legislature against Federalist charges of impiously releasing 'disaffected' from funding established clergy and extending suffrage to poll taxpayers, portraying these as positive democratic reforms.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE.

The old federal party has been distinguished from those who profess Republican principles as much by its admiration of aristocratical permanent establishments, of every description, religious as well as political, as by any other characteristic. True it is, that since the accession of a number of non-descripts to the party, it has become necessary to play hide and seek with their politics, and to say as little of their first principles, as in Congress would exhibit. But ever and anon, in election contest, the cloven foot peeps from the cloak of disguise, and federalism in its pristine personality stands confessed. In a Boston paper, amidst other electioneering matter, we find a string of reasons why a Republican Legislature should not be elected, deduced from the acts of a former Republican Legislature; among which the following objection to the doings of that body is prominently stated :

"They impinged the constitutional provi- sion for the support of a public worship, by releasing the DISAFFECTED from con- tributing to the support of PERMANENT TEACHERS OF PIETY, RELIGION AND MO- RALITY."

These New England democrats must be terrible fellows, most impious, irreligious, and immoral indeed : they even went so far, when the faction got into power, as to re- lease the " disaffected" from contributing to the support of' permanent teachers of piety, religion and morality " They refused to support an established church--that's the plain English of it; they refused longer to compel the disaffected, that is, those who choose to go to heaven their own way, to pay an established clergy for propagating tenets the reverse of what they professed. Is not it a wonder, after this, they did not order all the bibles and prayer books to be burnt, and the churches to be converted into play- houses? They did not do this; but they did another thing, which in the eyes of an old school federalist is just as bad -They ex- tended the right of suffrage! Yes, in the words of our text, " That (Democratic) Le- gislature, in violation of all the ancient u- sages of the Commonwealth, gave to every transient person, who merely pays a poll tax, the right to vote in all town affairs." Yes, not only a right to vote, but a right to vote in all town affairs! These are the un- forgiven sins of the Democracy of Massa- chusetts. These are the criminal charges exhibited by Federalists against them. What say the people, the jury who are to try them? Guilty or not guilty? Not guilty. on our honor.

What sub-type of article is it?

Moral Or Religious Constitutional Suffrage

What keywords are associated?

Church State Union Religious Establishment Suffrage Extension Federalist Criticism Republican Defense Massachusetts Politics

What entities or persons were involved?

Federal Party Republican Principles New England Democrats Democratic Legislature Of Massachusetts Federalists

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Of Church State Separation And Suffrage Extension Against Federalist Criticism

Stance / Tone

Satirical Defense Of Republican Reforms

Key Figures

Federal Party Republican Principles New England Democrats Democratic Legislature Of Massachusetts Federalists

Key Arguments

Federalists Admire Aristocratical Religious Establishments Republicans Released Disaffected From Funding Established Clergy, Promoting Religious Freedom Extension Of Suffrage To Poll Taxpayers Violates Ancient Usages But Expands Democracy Federalist Criticisms Reveal True Principles During Elections People Should Acquit Republicans Of These 'Sins'

Are you sure?