Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
April 29, 1836
Richmond Enquirer
Richmond, Richmond County, Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial praises Representative Vanderpoel's eloquent speech critiquing political figures but opposes his support for the tariff compromise, urging its revision to prevent surplus revenue accumulation that threatens free institutions and constitutional integrity.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
Mr. Vanderpoel's Speech.
We have commenced this masterly and eloquent Speech of the Representative of the State of New York. We render him every tribute which is due to his fine talents and his powerful views. It is an admirable Speech: has some fine hits, and is piquant enough upon the Bellwether of the little White Party in the House. We differ with him, however, on his first proposition. We should touch the Tariff, and expunge all those insidious schemes for the distribution of the surplus revenue.—They are all dangerous. They contain the seeds of mortality to our free institutions. We protest, too, against the inviolability of the Tariff compromise. We had no lot or part in it, to that extent—and if the public interests demand it, sooner than accumulate a disastrous surplus, by means of which new powers may be bought for the Federal Government, it becomes our duty to cut it down. If we are either to unsettle the Constitution or the Compromise, as it is called, we say at once, let it be the latter.
We have commenced this masterly and eloquent Speech of the Representative of the State of New York. We render him every tribute which is due to his fine talents and his powerful views. It is an admirable Speech: has some fine hits, and is piquant enough upon the Bellwether of the little White Party in the House. We differ with him, however, on his first proposition. We should touch the Tariff, and expunge all those insidious schemes for the distribution of the surplus revenue.—They are all dangerous. They contain the seeds of mortality to our free institutions. We protest, too, against the inviolability of the Tariff compromise. We had no lot or part in it, to that extent—and if the public interests demand it, sooner than accumulate a disastrous surplus, by means of which new powers may be bought for the Federal Government, it becomes our duty to cut it down. If we are either to unsettle the Constitution or the Compromise, as it is called, we say at once, let it be the latter.
What sub-type of article is it?
Economic Policy
Constitutional
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Vanderpoel Speech
Tariff Compromise
Surplus Revenue
Free Institutions
Federal Government
White Party
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Vanderpoel
Bellwether Of The Little White Party
Federal Government
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Tariff Compromise And Revenue Distribution In Vanderpoel's Speech
Stance / Tone
Praiseful Of Speech But Oppositional To Tariff Protectionism
Key Figures
Mr. Vanderpoel
Bellwether Of The Little White Party
Federal Government
Key Arguments
Vanderpoel's Speech Is Masterly, Eloquent, And Admirable With Fine Hits On Political Opponents
Differ On First Proposition: Should Revise Tariff And Eliminate Surplus Revenue Distribution Schemes
Such Schemes Are Dangerous And Threaten Free Institutions
Tariff Compromise Is Not Inviolable And Should Be Cut Down To Avoid Surplus Empowering Federal Government
Prefer Unsettling The Compromise Over The Constitution