Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The New Hampshire Gazette And Historical Chronicle
Editorial November 9, 1764

The New Hampshire Gazette And Historical Chronicle

Portsmouth, Greenland, Rockingham County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

Editorial criticizes British ministers for restricting trade between North American colonies and Spanish/French in West Indies during peace, arguing it deprives markets for produce, cash for British goods, raises prices for essentials, hinders settlement, and benefits sugar planters in Parliament at the expense of broader British and colonial interests, including reduced customs revenue.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

THE people of North-America, and the traders in our settlements in the West-Indies, as well as most people in Britain, are surprised that our ministers don't see that the discouraging a trade between us and the Spaniards and French in time of peace in that part of the world, is destruction to ourselves, and is attended with the following unhappy consequences.

First, It deprives us of our principal markets for the lumber, and other produce of our lands in North America.

2dly, It prevents our having cash there to pay for British manufactures, for we had from the Spaniards great sums of money, in exchange for what we brought them, which our own people could well spare, and which they otherwise had no consumption for.

3dly, It is the greatest discouragement not only to our planters in North-America, but likewise to our fishermen in Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, &c. for they got rum and sugar 30 per cent cheaper there than in our own colonies; and now that our planters in the sugar islands have by these new acts made all North-America depend on them for these commodities, they will raise the price on these poor people to what extent they please.

4thly, This new law will effectually prevent the peopling of North-America, for to what purpose will people settle there, to cultivate land, when we cut them off from having it in their power to dispose of the produce of it.

These things are so evident, that it has always been the policy of a British ministry, till now, to wink at that trade, even in time of war, because we are enriched by it, and parted with nothing but what we had no use for.

Many people imagine that these late laws were the effect of French policy, because they have thrown great sums into the hands of the French Islanders, which the Spaniards sent to Jamaica and our other islands: others think the real cause of it to be this, we have now got between three or four members in a certain house, who are sugar planters, they find their votes to be necessary to people in power, and they clubbed together to make every thing a point with the administration, which they think is for their interest: for to fix them is the interest of the minister.

All America, and Great-Britain itself is sacrificed, not only in this instance, but in several others, particularly by that law, allowing sugars to be taken directly from our plantations to foreign markets, without touching at any port in Great-Britain.

It's the belief of all the officers at the Custom-house, that the customs this year will fall some hundred thousand pounds short, which is chiefly owing to this, and export of our manufactures must suffer a great diminution, as there won't be any thing in North America to pay for them; has not this the appearance of a party job, to gain a majority in a certain place, at the expense of the public interest? and how must the French laugh at us for maintaining men of war in America to man our fleets?

Indeed had we any other method to supply the public loss by the sugar ships not entering here, the allowing that commodity to be carried to foreign markets, directly, might be a right measure, as it would enable us to rival the French in these markets, by selling our sugar so much cheaper; but as it is scarce possible to raise the taxes on other things higher, this seems to be an indiscreet measure.

What sub-type of article is it?

Trade Or Commerce Economic Policy Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

North America Trade West Indies Commerce British Ministers Sugar Planters Influence Colonial Markets Economic Consequences French Policy Customs Revenue Loss

What entities or persons were involved?

British Ministers Sugar Planters Spaniards French People Of North America Traders In West Indies People In Britain

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Criticism Of British Trade Restrictions With Spanish And French In West Indies

Stance / Tone

Strongly Opposed To New Trade Laws Harming Colonial And British Interests

Key Figures

British Ministers Sugar Planters Spaniards French People Of North America Traders In West Indies People In Britain

Key Arguments

Deprives Principal Markets For Lumber And Produce Prevents Cash For British Manufactures From Spanish Trade Discourages North American Planters And Fishermen With Higher Rum And Sugar Prices Prevents Peopling Of North America By Limiting Produce Disposal Past British Policy Winked At Trade Even In War For Enrichment Laws Possibly Effect Of French Policy Benefiting French Islanders Influence Of Sugar Planters In Parliament Sacrificing Broader Interests Allows Sugars To Foreign Markets Directly Reducing British Customs Appearance Of Party Job For Majority At Public Expense Indiscreet Measure Without Tax Compensation

Are you sure?