Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe New Hampshire Gazette
Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
The Court of Common Pleas in Haverhill closed its adjourned sitting on Saturday morning last, with 20 verdicts rendered. The libel suit against the newspaper's editor, a political action entered in May 1830, generated the most interest; it has been tried three times, with the latest jury disagreeing, continuing to the next November term at Plymouth.
OCR Quality
Full Text
That the expense of prosecuting this suit is borne by the plaintiff on the record we do not believe, and we have strong reasons for disbelieving it.
In a pecuniary point of view, it would no doubt have been better for us had the case ended on the first trial, even had it gone against us, or there is no pretence, that the damage would have been any thing equal to what the cost has been to each party since that time. What the cost has been, we are at this time unable to determine, but every one at all acquainted with the blessings that result from a law suit, must know, that the expenses of TEN terms of court are not paid with a song—especially when a number of the most able counsel to be found are engaged in it. Well, more or less, it is several hundred dollars, and as yet we have fortunately been enabled to face up the expense of the defence single handed, and if the plaintiff has paid up his bills, we have no doubt a purse has been raised for that purpose by those who led him into the scrape. Haverhill Rep.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Haverhill
Event Date
Saturday Morning Last
Key Persons
Outcome
jury disagreed on third trial; action continued to next november term at plymouth; high legal costs to both parties, several hundred dollars
Event Details
Libel suit entered May 1830 against newspaper editor; tried three times with hung juries on first and third; second trial in November 1832 resulted in verdict for defendant, sustained July 1833; writ of review November 1833; political suit intended to ruin editor