Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Virginia Argus
Editorial September 5, 1804

Virginia Argus

Richmond, Virginia

What is this article about?

Editorial from Salem Register criticizes recent British naval aggressions on U.S. merchant vessels, including the Cambrian frigate's actions in New York harbor. Warns against entering a new commercial treaty like Jay's, advocating for maintaining neutral trade rights without concessions to belligerents.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

FROM THE SALEM REGISTER.

It might be supposed that the British by their captures of our vessels, expected to drive us to a new commercial treaty. They pursued this line of conduct at the commencement of the last war, and the then administration sought protection in a treaty which sacrificed many of our best commercial rights, and under which we sustained hardships, and sufferings, almost too grievous to be borne. Mr. Pitt is now hardly seated at the helm in Great Britain, before the English frigates infest our coasts and blockade some of our seaports. It is not meant to be insinuated that Mr. Pitt has given orders to distress our commerce, but it would seem that British vessels of war have very lately made considerable depredations upon our defenceless merchant vessels. The affair of the Cambrian in impressing a ship's crew above the narrows, in New York harbour, was such as to call for executive interference, and this we understand was afforded in a prompt and efficacious manner. The frigate found it necessary to quit the port of New York where she was a very unwelcome guest, but her subsequent conduct off the Hook is pretty conclusive evidence that her commander is bound by no other law than that which his cannon enforces.

If his government sanctions aggressions like these, if it does not disavow outrages that bear the mark and stamp of intentional and premeditated insult, then will it be evident that he acts under authority then will the nation be convinced that Great Britain means to try how far she may go without absolutely breaking friendship with America.

In due time there cannot be a doubt that the circumstances connected with the violation of our national sovereignty by the Cambrian, will be communicated to the nation.

To compel the United States to a commercial treaty similar to Jay's, we would suppose it totally inadmissible. Provisions for instance, can never again be considered in any case as becoming contraband. The principle of an undefined blockade, could not be agreed to. The list of contraband articles could not be admitted on the enlarged scale that Jay's treaty had sanctioned, and the examination of neutral ships, whether with or without enemies' goods, could not be allowed to the former extent without an abandonment of the right of free trade.

But why agree to any commercial treaty? Why give up rights we ought to enjoy, as the inheritance of a brave people, bound by no ties, but those which our independence gave us? Commercial treaties are a sort of cobwebs. The belligerent nations are the spiders, and the neutrals are no other than the poor unfortunate flies, which get entangled in the snares of admiralty courts, &c. where their wings are clipped, and if they escape adjudication it is more than what may be expected. The United States should take warning from past errors, and not again fall into the spider's web, for such the old treaty with England proved to this country.

What sub-type of article is it?

Foreign Affairs Trade Or Commerce War Or Peace

What keywords are associated?

British Aggressions Commercial Treaty Jay's Treaty Neutral Rights Maritime Depredations Cambrian Frigate U.S. Commerce

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Pitt British Government Cambrian Frigate Jay's Treaty United States

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

British Naval Aggressions On U.S. Commerce And Opposition To New Commercial Treaties

Stance / Tone

Critical Of British Actions, Against Concessions In Treaties

Key Figures

Mr. Pitt British Government Cambrian Frigate Jay's Treaty United States

Key Arguments

British Captures Aim To Force A New Commercial Treaty Past Treaty Sacrificed U.S. Rights And Caused Hardships Cambrian's Impressment And Actions Violate U.S. Sovereignty Government Must Disavow Such Aggressions Or Reveal Intent To Pressure U.S. No New Treaty Should Allow Contraband Provisions, Undefined Blockades, Or Expanded Searches Commercial Treaties Trap Neutrals Like Flies In Spiders' Webs U.S. Should Assert Independence And Avoid Past Errors

Are you sure?