Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Daily Herald
Domestic News July 9, 1835

The Daily Herald

New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut

What is this article about?

Gen. Ashley, Missouri's former congressional representative and re-election candidate, addresses constituents explaining his vote to retain public funds in the Bank of the United States for safety and national benefit, noting two-thirds of Congress agreed but supported the President after deposit removal.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Gen. Ashley, the late very respectable Representative in Congress from Missouri, and a candidate for re-election, says, in an address to his constituents, that he voted for continuing the public money in the Bank of the United States, because he considered it safe there, and because he believed it for the interest and convenience of the nation that it should remain in that general establishment—and the Secretary of the Treasury acknowledged his faith in its security: "and I feel assured (adds the General) that two-thirds of both Houses of Congress were, and still are, of that opinion; and would not at any time have voted for the removal of the deposits: but, as they had been removed by the President, through the Secretary, to sustain these officers they voted against the restoration."

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Gen Ashley Bank Of The United States Public Deposits Congress Vote Presidential Removal

What entities or persons were involved?

Gen. Ashley Secretary Of The Treasury

Where did it happen?

Missouri

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Missouri

Key Persons

Gen. Ashley Secretary Of The Treasury

Event Details

Gen. Ashley addresses constituents explaining his vote for continuing public money in the Bank of the United States due to its safety and national interest; Secretary of the Treasury acknowledged its security; he asserts two-thirds of Congress shared this opinion and would not have voted for removal, but after presidential removal via the Secretary, they voted against restoration to support the officers.

Are you sure?