Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 22, 1860
Virginia Free Press
Charles Town, Jefferson County, West Virginia
What is this article about?
Critiques the Democratic party's 'principles, not men' slogan as hypocritical, noting they require a two-thirds vote for nominations but only a majority for platform principles, as highlighted by the Virginia Herald and Richmond Enquirer.
OCR Quality
88%
Good
Full Text
Principles, Not Men.
The humbuggery of this rallying cry of the Democracy is exposed in everything they do, but in nothing, perhaps, more distinctly than in the use they make of the two thirds rule. As our friend of the Virginia Herald says, it is a notorious fact, whilst they require a two thirds vote to require a nomination, yet, a simple majority is sufficient to determine the character of the principles enunciated in the Platform of the party.
Strange and remarkable inconsistency!
The Richmond Enquirer itself breaks forth with the apostrophe "By a strange anomaly, 'principles,' the life-blood of the party, are subordinated to men, the mere instruments to carry out principles." When a Democratic elector prates to you from the hustings, with the loud, boasting boast, that his party creed is "principles, not men," ask him how it is that he subordinates "principles" to men, the secondary, while the primary, the Convention. The lighter, the nominee, must receive the endorsement of a two-thirds vote, whilst the weightier and main matter, the principles, may be settled by a mere majority vote! There is food for reflection and a vast field of meat for political mastication in this roll of inconsistencies.
The humbuggery of this rallying cry of the Democracy is exposed in everything they do, but in nothing, perhaps, more distinctly than in the use they make of the two thirds rule. As our friend of the Virginia Herald says, it is a notorious fact, whilst they require a two thirds vote to require a nomination, yet, a simple majority is sufficient to determine the character of the principles enunciated in the Platform of the party.
Strange and remarkable inconsistency!
The Richmond Enquirer itself breaks forth with the apostrophe "By a strange anomaly, 'principles,' the life-blood of the party, are subordinated to men, the mere instruments to carry out principles." When a Democratic elector prates to you from the hustings, with the loud, boasting boast, that his party creed is "principles, not men," ask him how it is that he subordinates "principles" to men, the secondary, while the primary, the Convention. The lighter, the nominee, must receive the endorsement of a two-thirds vote, whilst the weightier and main matter, the principles, may be settled by a mere majority vote! There is food for reflection and a vast field of meat for political mastication in this roll of inconsistencies.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Democratic Party
Principles Not Men
Two Thirds Rule
Party Platform
Political Inconsistency
What entities or persons were involved?
Democracy
Virginia Herald
Richmond Enquirer
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Hypocrisy In Democratic Party's 'Principles, Not Men' Slogan Regarding Nomination And Platform Rules
Stance / Tone
Critical And Mocking Of Democratic Inconsistencies
Key Figures
Democracy
Virginia Herald
Richmond Enquirer
Key Arguments
Democratic Party Requires Two Thirds Vote For Nominations But Majority For Platform Principles
This Subordinates Principles To Men, Contradicting Their Slogan
Richmond Enquirer Acknowledges The Anomaly Of Prioritizing Men Over Principles