Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Religious Herald
Domestic News November 22, 1855

The Religious Herald

Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut

What is this article about?

In 1843, the Collinsville Axe Company sold a lot to Mr. Marcy with a clause voiding the deed if liquor was sold on the premises. The company sued to reclaim the land, claiming liquor sales occurred. The jury ruled for Marcy, finding no forfeiture without his knowledge.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

A case of some interest to tenants and landlords was decided last week in the Superior Court now in session in this city. In the year 1843 the Collinsville Axe Company sold a building lot to a Mr. Marcy, with a proviso in the deed that if any liquor should be sold on the premises the deed should be void. The Company claimed that liquor had been sold, and asked to be reinstated in their ownership of the land. Marcy denied that liquors had been sold with his knowledge or consent. The judge instructed the jury that if liquor had been sold with the knowledge of Marcy, and he had not attempted to stop the sales, the Company would be entitled to recover; but if sold without his knowledge, the right of ownership had not been forfeited. Verdict of the jury for defendant.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Court Case Liquor Proviso Deed Void Superior Court Tenant Landlord Dispute

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Marcy Collinsville Axe Company

Domestic News Details

Event Date

Last Week

Key Persons

Mr. Marcy Collinsville Axe Company

Outcome

verdict of the jury for defendant

Event Details

The Collinsville Axe Company sold a building lot to Mr. Marcy in 1843 with a proviso that the deed would be void if liquor was sold on the premises. The Company claimed liquor had been sold and sought reinstatement of ownership. Marcy denied knowledge or consent of any sales. The judge instructed the jury that recovery was possible only if sales occurred with Marcy's knowledge and without his attempts to stop them; otherwise, no forfeiture. The jury found for the defendant.

Are you sure?