Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 17, 1848
The Davenport Gazette
Davenport, Scott County, Iowa
What is this article about?
The Haverhill Gazette editor defends against accusations of dishonesty for initially opposing Gen. Taylor's nomination but now supporting him over Cass, using a simile comparing it to refusing a flawed ship but not sinking to a mud-scow alternative.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
AN APT ILLUSTRATION.
The editor of the Haverhill (Mass.) Gazette, in a dignified reply to an insulting communication, abusing him for supporting Gen. Taylor, forcibly illustrates the position of the 'disaffected Whigs' by a striking simile. He says:--
'Our writings against the nomination of Taylor are quoted with all imaginable absurdity, as if they pledged us to oppose his election after the question is reduced to him or Cass. We are accused of dishonesty, and asked why we do not go to 'picking pockets for a living, if we cannot afford to be a man?' We can afford to be a man, but not to be an idiot, and feel that we can no more justly be charged with dishonesty or inconsistency than the man who should refuse to take passage across the ocean in a packet ship because he had objected for some reason to that particular ship being put upon the line. According to these wise casuists, he should throw himself into a mud-scow, without the slightest regard to its capacity of ever reaching the destined shore, and do all in his power, by torpedoes, fireballs and false lights, to wreck the ship to which he has objected.'
The editor of the Haverhill (Mass.) Gazette, in a dignified reply to an insulting communication, abusing him for supporting Gen. Taylor, forcibly illustrates the position of the 'disaffected Whigs' by a striking simile. He says:--
'Our writings against the nomination of Taylor are quoted with all imaginable absurdity, as if they pledged us to oppose his election after the question is reduced to him or Cass. We are accused of dishonesty, and asked why we do not go to 'picking pockets for a living, if we cannot afford to be a man?' We can afford to be a man, but not to be an idiot, and feel that we can no more justly be charged with dishonesty or inconsistency than the man who should refuse to take passage across the ocean in a packet ship because he had objected for some reason to that particular ship being put upon the line. According to these wise casuists, he should throw himself into a mud-scow, without the slightest regard to its capacity of ever reaching the destined shore, and do all in his power, by torpedoes, fireballs and false lights, to wreck the ship to which he has objected.'
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Disaffected Whigs
Taylor Nomination
Cass Election
Political Inconsistency
Whig Support
What entities or persons were involved?
Gen. Taylor
Cass
Haverhill Gazette Editor
Disaffected Whigs
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Against Accusations Of Inconsistency In Supporting Taylor Over Cass
Stance / Tone
Defensive And Illustrative Of Whig Position
Key Figures
Gen. Taylor
Cass
Haverhill Gazette Editor
Disaffected Whigs
Key Arguments
Initial Opposition To Taylor's Nomination Does Not Pledge Opposition To His Election Against Cass
Accusations Of Dishonesty Are Absurd, Like Refusing A Flawed Ship But Not Choosing A Worse Alternative
True Inconsistency Would Be Sabotaging The Better Option To Support An Inferior One