Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
October 1, 1851
Washington Telegraph
Washington, Hempstead County, Arkansas
What is this article about?
An editorial defends President Millard Fillmore against southern Democratic attacks republishing his 1838 letter, arguing his recent actions and support for the Compromise as a final settlement demonstrate his patriotism and national leadership, contrasting with figures like Polk, Buchanan, and Thompson.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
ATTACKS UPON MR. FILLMORE.—Some of the southern opposition journals are republishing a letter of Mr. Fillmore, written in 1838, as if that could afford a better index of his conduct than this recent action and declarations. That letter even when published before the election, and without the powerful testimony of the acts of the President, failed to convince the people of the South that Mr. Fillmore was unworthy to be trusted with power. This exploded bomb-shell will hardly have any effect now, when the Administration of Mr. Fillmore is before the country, and has not only imparted confidence to the men of both sections and parties, but extorted strong expressions of admiration from the most distinguished leaders of the Democracy for his manly and national course. Could a southern President have done more than Mr. Fillmore has done? Did James K. Polk do more? Why do not these Democratic prints quote from Mr. Fillmore's annual message, his declaration that he considers the Compromise a "final settlement," and his exhortations to his countrymen to stand by and support it? Even had Mr. Fillmore ever occupied such objectionable ground as they represent, his acts have proved him a true patriot and a just and firm American President. It is not every Democratic politician who can explain the past by such testimony as that which Mr. Fillmore has given, in his faithful adherence to the Constitution, and in supporting it at the point of self sacrifice. Why do not the Democracy object to Mr. Buchanan on the score of his ancient Freesoilism upon the Missouri question, or his old Federalism? Why do they regard Geo. W. Thompson as now fit to represent Virginia in Congress after that celebrated oration? If they give to these gentlemen the benefit of the lights of time and experience, should they not also extend their charity to the President, who never in his life occupied such an anti-American position as Mr. Buchanan, nor held such anti-slavery radicalism as Mr. Thompson, and who has proved by his Administration that he is true at once to the South and to the whole country.
Richmond Republican.
Richmond Republican.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Fillmore Defense
Southern Opposition
Compromise Settlement
Democratic Attacks
Presidential Patriotism
Constitutional Adherence
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Fillmore
James K. Polk
Mr. Buchanan
Geo. W. Thompson
Richmond Republican
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Millard Fillmore Against Southern Opposition Attacks
Stance / Tone
Strongly Supportive Of Fillmore's Presidency And Compromise Adherence
Key Figures
Mr. Fillmore
James K. Polk
Mr. Buchanan
Geo. W. Thompson
Richmond Republican
Key Arguments
Fillmore's 1838 Letter Failed To Sway Southern Opinion Before And Is Irrelevant Now
Fillmore's Administration Has Earned Admiration From Democrats For Its National Course
Fillmore Views The Compromise As A Final Settlement And Urges Support
Fillmore's Actions Prove His Patriotism Despite Past Positions
Democrats Overlook Past Radicalism In Their Own Leaders Like Buchanan And Thompson