Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Washington Telegraph
Editorial October 1, 1851

Washington Telegraph

Washington, Hempstead County, Arkansas

What is this article about?

An editorial defends President Millard Fillmore against southern Democratic attacks republishing his 1838 letter, arguing his recent actions and support for the Compromise as a final settlement demonstrate his patriotism and national leadership, contrasting with figures like Polk, Buchanan, and Thompson.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

ATTACKS UPON MR. FILLMORE.—Some of the southern opposition journals are republishing a letter of Mr. Fillmore, written in 1838, as if that could afford a better index of his conduct than this recent action and declarations. That letter even when published before the election, and without the powerful testimony of the acts of the President, failed to convince the people of the South that Mr. Fillmore was unworthy to be trusted with power. This exploded bomb-shell will hardly have any effect now, when the Administration of Mr. Fillmore is before the country, and has not only imparted confidence to the men of both sections and parties, but extorted strong expressions of admiration from the most distinguished leaders of the Democracy for his manly and national course. Could a southern President have done more than Mr. Fillmore has done? Did James K. Polk do more? Why do not these Democratic prints quote from Mr. Fillmore's annual message, his declaration that he considers the Compromise a "final settlement," and his exhortations to his countrymen to stand by and support it? Even had Mr. Fillmore ever occupied such objectionable ground as they represent, his acts have proved him a true patriot and a just and firm American President. It is not every Democratic politician who can explain the past by such testimony as that which Mr. Fillmore has given, in his faithful adherence to the Constitution, and in supporting it at the point of self sacrifice. Why do not the Democracy object to Mr. Buchanan on the score of his ancient Freesoilism upon the Missouri question, or his old Federalism? Why do they regard Geo. W. Thompson as now fit to represent Virginia in Congress after that celebrated oration? If they give to these gentlemen the benefit of the lights of time and experience, should they not also extend their charity to the President, who never in his life occupied such an anti-American position as Mr. Buchanan, nor held such anti-slavery radicalism as Mr. Thompson, and who has proved by his Administration that he is true at once to the South and to the whole country.

Richmond Republican.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Constitutional

What keywords are associated?

Fillmore Defense Southern Opposition Compromise Settlement Democratic Attacks Presidential Patriotism Constitutional Adherence

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Fillmore James K. Polk Mr. Buchanan Geo. W. Thompson Richmond Republican

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Of Millard Fillmore Against Southern Opposition Attacks

Stance / Tone

Strongly Supportive Of Fillmore's Presidency And Compromise Adherence

Key Figures

Mr. Fillmore James K. Polk Mr. Buchanan Geo. W. Thompson Richmond Republican

Key Arguments

Fillmore's 1838 Letter Failed To Sway Southern Opinion Before And Is Irrelevant Now Fillmore's Administration Has Earned Admiration From Democrats For Its National Course Fillmore Views The Compromise As A Final Settlement And Urges Support Fillmore's Actions Prove His Patriotism Despite Past Positions Democrats Overlook Past Radicalism In Their Own Leaders Like Buchanan And Thompson

Are you sure?