Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
April 6, 1950
The Potters Herald
East Liverpool, Columbiana County, Ohio
What is this article about?
Editorial contrasts Federal Judge Medina's impartial trial of 11 top communists in New York with Federal Judge Jones' anti-labor tirade to new citizens in Cleveland, praising Medina's integrity and questioning Jones' fairness toward unions.
Clipping
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
A Tale Of Two Judges
A contrast between two judges provides "food for thought."
In New York, Federal Judge Medina, despite extreme provocation from lawyers for 11 top communists, patiently gave the "Reds" a fair trial. A jury convicted them of "conspiring to overthrow the government by violence."
An anti-communist organization decided to pay tribute to Medina by inviting him to be its guest of honor at a dinner. The judge declined, on the ground that he "would appear to be taking sides in a matter tried before me and now pending an appeal." Medina said he wanted to avoid the slightest reflection on the "integrity of the courts."
On the same day, at Cleveland. Federal Judge Jones talked to a group of newly naturalized citizens. Instead of trying to inspire them with the history and ideals of our country, he gave them a bitter tirade against labor unions and against the "right to strike."
Could a union or its members get as fair a trial in Jones' court as even communists could get in Medina's? If more judges were like Jones, and fewer like Medina, how long would the American people keep their faith in the impartiality of the courts?
A contrast between two judges provides "food for thought."
In New York, Federal Judge Medina, despite extreme provocation from lawyers for 11 top communists, patiently gave the "Reds" a fair trial. A jury convicted them of "conspiring to overthrow the government by violence."
An anti-communist organization decided to pay tribute to Medina by inviting him to be its guest of honor at a dinner. The judge declined, on the ground that he "would appear to be taking sides in a matter tried before me and now pending an appeal." Medina said he wanted to avoid the slightest reflection on the "integrity of the courts."
On the same day, at Cleveland. Federal Judge Jones talked to a group of newly naturalized citizens. Instead of trying to inspire them with the history and ideals of our country, he gave them a bitter tirade against labor unions and against the "right to strike."
Could a union or its members get as fair a trial in Jones' court as even communists could get in Medina's? If more judges were like Jones, and fewer like Medina, how long would the American people keep their faith in the impartiality of the courts?
What sub-type of article is it?
Legal Reform
Crime Or Punishment
What keywords are associated?
Judicial Impartiality
Fair Trial
Communists
Labor Unions
Judge Bias
What entities or persons were involved?
Federal Judge Medina
Federal Judge Jones
11 Top Communists
Anti Communist Organization
Labor Unions
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Contrast Between Impartial Judge Medina And Biased Judge Jones
Stance / Tone
Praising Judicial Impartiality, Critical Of Bias Against Labor
Key Figures
Federal Judge Medina
Federal Judge Jones
11 Top Communists
Anti Communist Organization
Labor Unions
Key Arguments
Medina Patiently Gave Fair Trial To Communists Despite Provocation
Jury Convicted Communists Of Conspiracy To Overthrow Government
Medina Declined Dinner Invitation To Avoid Appearance Of Bias
Jones Delivered Anti Labor And Anti Strike Tirade To New Citizens
Questions If Unions Could Get Fair Trial In Jones' Court
More Judges Like Jones Would Erode Faith In Court Impartiality