Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Prescott Daily News
Editorial September 25, 1912

The Prescott Daily News

Prescott, Nevada County, Arkansas

What is this article about?

This editorial criticizes the Republican protective tariff law for discriminating against the poor by imposing higher duties on cheaper goods, providing numerous examples of percentage duties on items like blankets, flannels, stockings, and gloves that burden lower-income consumers more heavily.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

TAXING POOR MAN'S
COAT OFF HIS BACK
Concrete Illustration of What a Republican Tariff Really Means
Causes Workers to Think.

Concrete examples of how a protective tariff operates are causing the sort of thinking nowadays. He is beginning to understand whether it is about time to call a halt on the Republican practice of taxing the coat off his back and threatening him with the loss of his shirt and his socks if he does not submit.

All through the present tariff law, passed by a Republican congress and endorsed by a Republican President THE BEST TARIFF BILL EVER PASSED, are to be found discriminations, the higher duty on the cheaper article, the lower on the shoulders of those least able to bear it the greatest burden of the protective system.

Here are some illustrations:
The cheapest wool blankets bear a duty of 165.42 per cent.; the dearest, 44.55 per cent.
Flannels, not more than 40 cents a pound, are taxed at 143.67 per cent.; over 70 cents a pound, 76.37 per cent.
Wool plushes, cheapest, 141.75 per cent.; dearest, 95.33 per cent.
Knit fabrics, cheapest, 141 per cent.; dearest, 95.53 per cent.
Stockings worth from $1. to $1.50 dozen, 76.37 per cent.; from $2 to $3, 59 per cent.
Hats and bonnets, worth not over $20 a dozen, 62 per cent.; over $20 a dozen, 35 per cent.
Carpets, highest priced, 50 per cent.; that used for mats and rugs, 126.88 per cent.
Women's gloves, unlined, 49 per cent.; lined, 34 per cent.; longest gloves, unlined, 42 per cent.; lined, 29 per cent.
Men's gloves, worth less than $3 a dozen, 66.28 per cent.; costliest gloves, 45 per cent.; leather, unlined, 44.58 per cent.; lined, 29.50 per cent.
Buckles, cheapest, 77.48 per cent.; dearest, 26.3 per cent.
Uncut diamonds bear a 10 per cent. duty; imitation diamonds, 20 per cent.
The humble firecracker bears a 102 per cent, duty, while elaborate fireworks bear but 70 per cent.
Matting, smaller and cheaper grades, 40 per cent.; costlier, 24 per cent.
Watch movements, seven jewels, 102 per cent.; 11 jewels, 40.41 per cent.; 17 jewels, 34.45 per cent.
Underwear, cheapest, 56.90 per cent.; dearest, 50 per cent.
Dress goods of wool, cheapest, 105.42 per cent.; dearest, 94.13 per cent.
Velvets, cheapest, 105.22 per cent.; dearest, 49.55 per cent.
Silk handkerchiefs, cheapest, 77.44 cent.; dearest, 59 per cent.
Scissors, worth 50 cents a dozen, 21 per cent.; worth $1.75 a dozen, 50 per cent.
Table knives, fancy grades, 57.40 cent.; bone handled, 69.43 per cent.
Butcher knives, best grades, 52.10 per cent.; cheapest grades, 93.55 per cent.
Files, smallest, 81.29 per cent.; longest, 36.81 per cent.
Shot guns, worth from $5 to $10, 47.67 per cent.; worth over $10, 45.46 per cent.

These are only a part of the discriminations, gleaned from a swift conning of some of the schedules. Reduced to simplest terms, they mean that the poor man is taxed higher than the rich man.

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Policy Taxation Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Protective Tariff Republican Policy Tax Burden Poor Vs Rich Duty Rates Discriminations

What entities or persons were involved?

Republican Congress Republican President

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Discriminatory Effects Of Republican Protective Tariff On The Poor

Stance / Tone

Strongly Critical Of Republican Tariff Policy

Key Figures

Republican Congress Republican President

Key Arguments

Protective Tariff Imposes Higher Duties On Cheaper Goods, Burdening The Poor Examples Show Duties Up To 165% On Cheap Blankets Vs 44% On Expensive Ones Tariff Law Endorsed As 'The Best Ever' But Discriminates Against Lower Classes Poor Taxed Higher Than Rich In Simplest Terms

Are you sure?