Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Gazette Of The United States
Editorial April 20, 1791

Gazette Of The United States

New York, New York County, New York

What is this article about?

Editorial critiques preference for theoretical economic opinions over practical experience, mocking a law professor's land tax idea and attributing congressional opposition to funding, excise, and bank measures to fallacious theory.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

A late writer judiciously observes, that he had rather be guided in his opinions by one experienced man of business, than by an hundred theorists, who are versed only in books.

A celebrated Law Professor in one of the States, once said, that it would be best to raise all public revenue entirely by a land tax, because all taxes come ultimately out of the land. The old financiers of all countries, who know mankind, would laugh at such an opinion, tho advanced by an able law character. Some of the best arguments in Congress, on the funding system, on excise, and the bank, appear to be built on the same sandy basis, fallacious theory—otherwise it is impossible to account for the respectable opposition made to the most necessary measures of government.

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Policy Taxation

What keywords are associated?

Economic Theory Practical Finance Land Tax Funding System Excise Bank Congressional Debates

What entities or persons were involved?

Congress Law Professor Old Financiers

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Critique Of Theoretical Approaches To Public Finance And Taxation

Stance / Tone

Critical Of Fallacious Theory Favoring Practical Experience

Key Figures

Congress Law Professor Old Financiers

Key Arguments

Prefer Guidance From Experienced Business Men Over Bookish Theorists Land Tax As Sole Revenue Source Is A Laughable Opinion Congressional Arguments On Funding, Excise, And Bank Rely On Fallacious Theory Such Theory Explains Opposition To Necessary Government Measures

Are you sure?