Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Loudon Free Press
Story May 2, 1854

Loudon Free Press

Loudon, Loudon County, Roane County, Tennessee

What is this article about?

The New Orleans Crescent editorial asserts that Cuban documents prove the legal seizure of US steamer Black Warrior in Havana for port violations. US parties admitted legality but sought mercy via ignorance and precedent, privately apologizing while publicly agitating, and petitioned Spain's Queen to remit $6,000 fine. (214 chars)

Clipping

OCR Quality

75% Good

Full Text

THE BLACK WARRIOR CASE AGAIN.

The New Orleans Crescent, after copying the documents recently laid before the world by the Cuban authorities, says:

We consider these documents as clearly establishing the following points:

1. That the seizure and confiscation of the Black Warrior were, under the port regulations of Havana, legal and just.

2. That Captain Bulloch, his consignees Tyng and Co. and our consul, admit the fact that it was legal.

3. That they only in reality, contended, that they should be let off, first because they were ignorant of the law and language; 2d, because they had done so before; 3d, because it was not intentional fraud.

The Spaniard replies, "It is your business to know our regulations so that you might comply with them. No laws are guided by men's intentions. We can only consider their acts."

4. That the British steamers have always submitted to precisely what was required of the Black Warrior.

5. That while the language and the statements of Bulloch, Tyng, and "our consul" have been violent and denunciatory, they have been holding to the Cuban authorities only the language of apology and supplication. Thus they were at once encouraging the Spaniard to persist in his course, and exciting our government and people to make war upon him for that course.

6. That the owners, by submitting to take back their ship and cargo, confessed that they had done wrong in abandoning them.

7. That they have since still further given up their whole case, by a fact now brought to light: that they have addressed a petition to the Queen, supplicating her to remit, as of her grace, the fine of $6,000 imposed on them.

So far, after this, we cannot see that there is left a single vestige of this case.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Justice Deception Crime Punishment

What keywords are associated?

Black Warrior Seizure Confiscation Havana Regulations Legal Dispute Fine Remission

What entities or persons were involved?

Captain Bulloch Tyng And Co. Our Consul

Where did it happen?

Havana

Story Details

Key Persons

Captain Bulloch Tyng And Co. Our Consul

Location

Havana

Story Details

The New Orleans Crescent analyzes documents showing the seizure and confiscation of the Black Warrior was legal under Havana port regulations. Captain Bulloch, Tyng and Co., and the US consul admitted its legality but contended for leniency due to ignorance of law and language, prior practice, and lack of intent. They apologized to Cuban authorities while publicly denouncing them. British steamers complied similarly. Owners took back ship and cargo, confessing wrong, and petitioned the Queen to remit the $6,000 fine.

Are you sure?