Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
October 9, 1860
Newbern Weekly Progress
New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina
What is this article about?
Commentary from Selma Sentinel exposes Breckinridge electors in Alabama as supporting disunion and armed resistance to Lincoln's potential election, despite their denials.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
The Breckinridge Electors of Alabama.
From the following which we take from the Selma Ala., Sentinel it seems that the Breckinridge Electors in Alabama are almost unanimous for disunion in the event of Lincoln's election:
It is true the Breckinridge leaders in Alabama deny most emphatically that they are disunionists, and the Breckinridge Electors deny that they want disunion But let us look at them for a few moments. The men who put John C. Breckinridge in the field know well that with Breckinridge and Douglas both in the field, would divide the Democratic party, and thereby secure the election of Lincoln, and if Lincoln is elected they are for disunion Let us put these Breckinridge Electors upon the stand, and see what they are Take the stand Mr. Morgan, and answer:
"If Lincoln should be elected, would you consider that a sufficient cause for dissolving the Union, or would you be for resisting his inauguration?"
Mr. Morgan-I am for disunion if Lincoln is elected, and would urge the South to resist his inauguration by arms.
Take the stand Maj. David Hubbard and answer.
Mr. Hubbard-I would tear this government to atoms.
What say you, Mr. Dickinson?
I am for disunion and will resist by force of arms the inauguration of old Lincoln.
What say you r. Shorter?
I am for pulling the pillars from under the fabric the very moment Lincoln is elected.
What say you Mr. Battle ?
Resistance to his election, resistance to his inauguration, and disunion is the remedy.
What say you Col Garrott?
I am for disunion in any such a contingency.
What say you Mr. Kenedy ?
I am for Alabama seceding alone if Lincoln is elected, if no other Southern State can be induced to go with her.
What say you Mr. Brickel?
I rather think I am for secession if Lincoln is elected.
What say you Col. Cobb?
I rather a for disunion, but I had rather wait I believe.
So, now, if we are not very much mistaken, the above is the true position of every Breckinridge Elector in Alabama. Are the people of Alabama willing to stand idle and let these men elect Lincoln just because his election enables them to secede and throw the country into tumult and anarchy ? We leave the question to the people.
From the following which we take from the Selma Ala., Sentinel it seems that the Breckinridge Electors in Alabama are almost unanimous for disunion in the event of Lincoln's election:
It is true the Breckinridge leaders in Alabama deny most emphatically that they are disunionists, and the Breckinridge Electors deny that they want disunion But let us look at them for a few moments. The men who put John C. Breckinridge in the field know well that with Breckinridge and Douglas both in the field, would divide the Democratic party, and thereby secure the election of Lincoln, and if Lincoln is elected they are for disunion Let us put these Breckinridge Electors upon the stand, and see what they are Take the stand Mr. Morgan, and answer:
"If Lincoln should be elected, would you consider that a sufficient cause for dissolving the Union, or would you be for resisting his inauguration?"
Mr. Morgan-I am for disunion if Lincoln is elected, and would urge the South to resist his inauguration by arms.
Take the stand Maj. David Hubbard and answer.
Mr. Hubbard-I would tear this government to atoms.
What say you, Mr. Dickinson?
I am for disunion and will resist by force of arms the inauguration of old Lincoln.
What say you r. Shorter?
I am for pulling the pillars from under the fabric the very moment Lincoln is elected.
What say you Mr. Battle ?
Resistance to his election, resistance to his inauguration, and disunion is the remedy.
What say you Col Garrott?
I am for disunion in any such a contingency.
What say you Mr. Kenedy ?
I am for Alabama seceding alone if Lincoln is elected, if no other Southern State can be induced to go with her.
What say you Mr. Brickel?
I rather think I am for secession if Lincoln is elected.
What say you Col. Cobb?
I rather a for disunion, but I had rather wait I believe.
So, now, if we are not very much mistaken, the above is the true position of every Breckinridge Elector in Alabama. Are the people of Alabama willing to stand idle and let these men elect Lincoln just because his election enables them to secede and throw the country into tumult and anarchy ? We leave the question to the people.
What sub-type of article is it?
Historical Event
What themes does it cover?
Deception
What keywords are associated?
Breckinridge Electors
Alabama Disunion
Lincoln Election
Secession
Political Resistance
What entities or persons were involved?
John C. Breckinridge
Lincoln
Mr. Morgan
Maj. David Hubbard
Mr. Dickinson
Mr. Shorter
Mr. Battle
Col Garrott
Mr. Kenedy
Mr. Brickel
Col. Cobb
Where did it happen?
Alabama
Story Details
Key Persons
John C. Breckinridge
Lincoln
Mr. Morgan
Maj. David Hubbard
Mr. Dickinson
Mr. Shorter
Mr. Battle
Col Garrott
Mr. Kenedy
Mr. Brickel
Col. Cobb
Location
Alabama
Story Details
Breckinridge electors in Alabama deny being disunionists but individually affirm support for disunion, secession, and armed resistance if Lincoln is elected.