Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Litchfield Enquirer
Domestic News June 26, 1834

Litchfield Enquirer

Litchfield, Litchfield County, Connecticut

What is this article about?

In Washington on June 10, 1834, Rep. McKim's proposal to lend $15 million in treasury notes at 5% is viewed skeptically as a ploy against the Bank and to restore currency, amid growing concerns over Congress's lack of control on public money under President Jackson as adjournment nears.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

WASHINGTON, June 10, 1834.

The proposition of Mr. McKim, to authorize, by bill, the Secretary of the Treasury to lend treasury notes, to the amount of fifteen millions, to individuals, at five per cent. on good security, is considered as the great project of the government to extricate the people from the pangs of that cruel monster the Bank, to put an end to the public distress, to restore the soundness of the currency, and last, not least, to bring back the wandering people to the Jackson faith. The proposition has caused some merriment, and it is not impossible that a spirit of waggery, a desire to hear what Mr. McKim can say for and about his scheme, may induce a majority of the House to take up the subject for consideration. Mr. McKim may be a very good merchant, and a fortunate man as regards his personal means, but he has as little of the statesman in his composition, as is to be found in the meanest mind in creation. He has none of the orator about him, and no man, of any party, imagines that Mr. McKim is serious in offering his proposition as a real, bona fide, practical measure, or as any more than a bone thrown out to his clamorous constituents, to prevent them from tearing him to pieces.

One great question which is now asked, as the day of adjournment draws near, and uttered with increasing emphasis at every repetition, is—what is to become of the public money? Is it to be left at the sole disposal of General Jackson? Is there to be no guard, no check imposed by Congress, for its security and economical disbursement? It appears as if history will have to answer these questions in a manner which the founders of our system of government could never have conjectured. There are some, even of the Jackson men themselves, who, feeling that these are the questions which will be propounded to him by his constituents, on his return home, begin to fear that they will be unable to give a satisfactory reply; and that they will have to submit to severe censure or breaking up the session, without taking some step to make the money of the people safe, by taking it from under the Executive grasp, and placing it under the control of the law. There will be no step taken of this kind, and if the public revenue be abundant, so much the more danger will threaten the liberties of the people; because so much the greater will be the means in the hands of General Jackson of subverting those liberties, and perpetuating their own power, or giving power such direction as he may think fit.

[U. S. Gaz.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Economic

What keywords are associated?

Mckim Proposition Treasury Notes Public Money Jackson Administration Congress Debate Bank Monster Currency Restoration

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Mckim General Jackson

Where did it happen?

Washington

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Washington

Event Date

June 10, 1834

Key Persons

Mr. Mckim General Jackson

Outcome

proposition met with merriment and skepticism; no action expected on securing public money from executive control, raising fears of liberty threats.

Event Details

Mr. McKim proposes bill for Secretary of Treasury to lend $15 million in treasury notes at 5% to individuals on security, seen as anti-Bank measure to end distress and restore currency and Jackson support. Viewed as unserious ploy. As adjournment nears, concerns mount over public money's disposal solely by Jackson without Congressional checks, with fears of executive overreach and no steps taken to safeguard it.

Are you sure?