Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Daily Richmond Whig
Letter to Editor November 6, 1830

Daily Richmond Whig

Richmond, Virginia

What is this article about?

An 'Old Voter' recounts the history of senatorial representation in Virginia's Accomack, Northampton, and adjacent counties since the 1776 Constitution, advocating for western shore counties to cease opposing Accomack candidates and unite with Northampton for fair alternation based on population.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

FOR THE WHIG.

When the Constitution of 1776 was adopted, Accomack and Northampton composed a Senatorial District, and the first Senator was from Northampton, the next from Accomack, and thus alternately, (for 40 years,) during the whole time they formed a separate district, (Accomack having four votes to Northampton's one.) This arrangement was considered so binding, that no man could have ever broken it, and was never attempted except in one instance When Northampton was to have her turn, a citizen of Accomack did venture to offer, and Accomack gave the Northampton candidate a large majority. When Gloucester, Mathews and Middlesex, were added to the district, an arrangement might have been made, to support alternate candidates, from the eastern and western parts of the district. The district being enlarged, the first Senator was from Northampton, Mr. Parker; the second from Matthews, Mr. Patterson; the third from Middlesex, Mr. Braxton; the fourth from Gloucester, Mr. Jones; and Accomack never, of her own accord, offered an opposing candidate, but on the 5th election, when every county had a turn, she offered one, and an opposition was got up on the western shore and failed. When the new constitution was formed, it is believed that an arrangement would have been acceptable to the people of Accomack, whereby the citizens of the western shore might have had their turn of Senator according to their population; about one for the western shore, and then two for the eastern shore: by which the western portion of the district would have been benefitted.

Messrs Editors, I have some knowledge of the people in this Senatorial District, and I believe it would be to the interest of that part of the district west of the Chesapeake, not to continue their opposition to every candidate from Accomack. If they unite with Northampton against Accomack, they never can separate Northampton from Accomack; they may promote the interest of some few citizens of Northampton, but will not promote the interest of any of their own. There are too many citizens in Northampton, of high standing in the community, who do remember their native place, and where their prosperity first commenced, although some few have forgotten these considerations,

AN OLD VOTER.

What sub-type of article is it?

Political Persuasive Historical

What themes does it cover?

Politics Constitutional Rights

What keywords are associated?

Senatorial District Accomack Northampton Elections Constitution 1776 Western Shore Alternation

What entities or persons were involved?

An Old Voter Messrs Editors

Letter to Editor Details

Author

An Old Voter

Recipient

Messrs Editors

Main Argument

western shore counties should stop opposing accomack senatorial candidates and unite with northampton, respecting historical alternation and population-based fairness to benefit the district.

Notable Details

References Constitution Of 1776 Senators: Mr. Parker (Northampton), Mr. Patterson (Matthews), Mr. Braxton (Middlesex), Mr. Jones (Gloucester) Accomack's Four Votes To Northampton's One

Are you sure?