Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Daily Missoulian
Story September 30, 1909

The Daily Missoulian

Missoula, Missoula County, Montana

What is this article about?

General Frederick D. Grant in Washington responds to criticism from W. R. Michaels for leading a Chicago parade in uniform, affirming it supported good government and denying any prohibition on his actions.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

HAS PERFECT RIGHT TO MARCH
GENERAL FREDERICK D. GRANT
REPLIES
TO
MAN
WHO
CRITICISED HIM.

Washington, Sept. 29.—"It was not a temperance parade, but a demonstration in favor of good government and law and order, and I should have been derelict in my duty if I had not, when requested, headed the parade as I did, and I shall continue, until prohibited, to do the same thing whenever I deem it necessary to advance the cause of good government."

This is the substance of a statement made by General Frederick D. Grant today in answer to a protest made by W. R. Michaels, of Chicago, a member of the executive board of the United Societies for Local Self Government, criticizing General Grant for having appeared in full uniform in a so-called temperance parade in that city last Saturday.

General Grant added that there was no law, written or unwritten or regulation that in any way abridged his right to wear his uniform on occasions he saw fit and he assumed that no official action on the part of the war department would be taken in the matter.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Justice Moral Virtue

What keywords are associated?

General Grant Temperance Parade Military Uniform Good Government Law And Order

What entities or persons were involved?

General Frederick D. Grant W. R. Michaels

Where did it happen?

Washington

Story Details

Key Persons

General Frederick D. Grant W. R. Michaels

Location

Washington

Event Date

Sept. 29

Story Details

General Frederick D. Grant defends his participation in a Chicago parade in uniform, stating it was a demonstration for good government, not temperance, and asserts his right to wear his uniform without restriction.

Are you sure?