Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The North Carolina Standard
Story November 1, 1848

The North Carolina Standard

Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina

What is this article about?

Kentucky judge rules free negroes are not U.S. citizens, leading to sale of violator; commentary defends Southern states' rights to restrict them, notes similar laws in free states like Illinois, blames abolitionists. (187 chars)

Clipping

OCR Quality

100% Excellent

Full Text

Negroes Not Citizens. The Northern papers are commenting on a recent decision in Kentucky, by which a free negro was ordered to be sold for twelve months, for a violation of the law forbidding free negroes to reside in the State. A writer from Louisville, in allusion to the decision, says:

"Judge Bullock decided that the free negroes were not citizens of any State in the Union, in the sense the word citizen was used in the constitution of the United States. His opinion was delivered orally, and I can only give you the substance of it. He held, the negro was only a sojourner in the United States, and had no guaranties under the constitution; that he was not a party to the social compact, either of the State governments or of the government of the United States; that any State might drive the free negroes from their midst; that they were aliens and strangers in a strange land. The Judge was about two hours in delivering his opinion."

Before his opinion was delivered, I was of the opinion that "citizen," as used in the constitution of the United States, covered all classes and conditions of men who were born upon our soil, of free parents, and who were not aliens. But it seems that the negro born in the United States has no country.

The Southern States have always claimed the right to regulate the residence of free negroes within their jurisdiction, and we consider it an inherent right, of which they cannot be deprived. But it is not only in the slave States that this right has been claimed and exercised, as several of the free States have at different times, done the same thing. Illinois has gone even a step further, and deprived her Legislature of all control over the subject, by inserting a provision in her constitution, that prohibits all free negroes from coming in or settling in that State. We will venture to prophecy that other free States will ere many years follow the example.

If the free negroes are subject to restrictions in the slave States, which did not formerly exist, they have only to thank their abolition friends, whose proceedings have rendered it necessary that the Southern States should adopt these measures for self-defence and self-preservation.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Social Manners Justice Misfortune

What keywords are associated?

Free Negroes Citizenship Kentucky Decision Judge Bullock Racial Restrictions Southern States Illinois Constitution

What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Bullock

Where did it happen?

Kentucky, Louisville

Story Details

Key Persons

Judge Bullock

Location

Kentucky, Louisville

Story Details

Judge Bullock ruled that free negroes are not citizens under the U.S. Constitution, allowing a free negro to be sold for 12 months for residing in Kentucky against the law. Commentary notes Southern and some free states' rights to regulate free negroes, blaming abolitionists.

Are you sure?