Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Daily Richmond Whig
Editorial April 1, 1830

Daily Richmond Whig

Richmond, Virginia

What is this article about?

The Richmond Whig editorial criticizes President Jackson's nominations, noting Senate confirmation of Samuel Swartwout as New York Collector despite his Burr ties, but rejection of J.P. Decatur and Mr. Cushman due to their roles in election violence. It argues this shows Jackson's unfitness and use of office for partisan rewards.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Richmond Whig.

THURSDAY MORNING, APRIL 1, 1830.

Swartwout, the Collector of New York, has been confirmed, after, it is supposed, an arduous scrutiny and struggle. The opinion prevails that he was saved by Tariff and probably Opposition votes, having proved himself an active officer in enforcing Tariff regulations. One of the New York Senators, (Mr. Dudley) and possibly the other, were stated to be hostile. Believing that the President was as much concerned with Burr as Swartwout, it strikes us that if the one is sufficiently purified to wear the robes of the first magistracy, the other may be considered worthy of a Collectorship. The Camel, as Mr. Barton says, having been swallowed with "complacency," it were ridiculous to strain at the gnat.

But the Senate have read another rebuke to the President, in the rejection of Mr. J. P. Decatur as Collector of Portsmouth, and Mr. Cushman as U. States' Attorney for N. Hampshire. Decatur was the leader in the burning of Mr. Bartlett's effigy at the N. Hampshire Presidential election. That was no doubt an argument for rewarding him. What must be the character of appointments, which a Jackson majority refuse to confirm? What must be the fitness of the man for the Presidency, who is so ignorant of character, or so resolved to reward his tools at public expense, as to make nominations, which the most devoted of parties cannot reconcile it to their oaths and consciences to approve?

Could stronger evidence of unfitness be asked? Will any man pretend, that he has not furnished irrefragible proof of his incompetency, and justified all that was predicted of his incapacity? Happy would it be for his historical reputation, if the egregious impropriety of many of his appointments, could be successfully traced to sheer ignorance; but a thousand facts proclaim that his heart is more in fault than his head; and that acting upon the one principle, of rewarding the instruments of his unhappy success, he has used the Presidential Office as a private fund, and done wrong with his eyes open. See the letter from Washington.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Economic Policy

What keywords are associated?

Jackson Appointments Senate Confirmations Political Patronage Tariff Enforcement Presidential Unfitness

What entities or persons were involved?

Swartwout President Jackson Mr. Dudley Mr. J. P. Decatur Mr. Cushman Burr Mr. Barton

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Criticism Of President Jackson's Political Appointments And Senate Rejections

Stance / Tone

Strongly Critical Of Jackson's Fitness And Partisan Patronage

Key Figures

Swartwout President Jackson Mr. Dudley Mr. J. P. Decatur Mr. Cushman Burr Mr. Barton

Key Arguments

Swartwout Confirmed Despite Burr Association, Aided By Tariff Enforcement Record Senate Rejects Decatur And Cushman For Involvement In Election Effigy Burning Jackson's Nominations Reveal Ignorance Or Deliberate Rewarding Of Partisan Tools Evidence Of Presidential Unfitness And Misuse Of Office For Personal Gain

Are you sure?