Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
January 5, 1811
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial & Political
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
An editorial criticizes the current U.S. administration for recommending the use of a standing army to enforce the non-intercourse law with Great Britain, contrasting it with the principles of liberty under Washington and Hamilton, and likening it to Napoleon's methods.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
From the Same.
The time was, when it would have been thought not only odious but in the highest degree dangerous to our liberties in this free country, in any extremity, to call in the aid of a standing army to enforce the execution of civil laws. Then too our armies were commanded by such men as Washington and Hamilton, neither foreigners themselves, nor the suspected pensioners of any foreign government. And those who were then most loud and clamorous are the men who have now the administration of the government in their own hands. But circumstances have altered cases. In the report of the secretary of the 10th ultimo, several extraordinary legislative provisions are recommended as necessary for enforcing the law of non-intercourse with Great Britain, among which is, "an authority to the armed force of the U. States to make seizures." What would have been thought in the days of Washington, of a proposition from the cabinet, to employ a standing army to carry into effect an act of congress for the regulation of commerce? Napoleon however, who "loves the Americans," does things in this way; and the Americans who love Napoleon, must be allowed to imitate the example.
The time was, when it would have been thought not only odious but in the highest degree dangerous to our liberties in this free country, in any extremity, to call in the aid of a standing army to enforce the execution of civil laws. Then too our armies were commanded by such men as Washington and Hamilton, neither foreigners themselves, nor the suspected pensioners of any foreign government. And those who were then most loud and clamorous are the men who have now the administration of the government in their own hands. But circumstances have altered cases. In the report of the secretary of the 10th ultimo, several extraordinary legislative provisions are recommended as necessary for enforcing the law of non-intercourse with Great Britain, among which is, "an authority to the armed force of the U. States to make seizures." What would have been thought in the days of Washington, of a proposition from the cabinet, to employ a standing army to carry into effect an act of congress for the regulation of commerce? Napoleon however, who "loves the Americans," does things in this way; and the Americans who love Napoleon, must be allowed to imitate the example.
What sub-type of article is it?
Constitutional
Partisan Politics
Military Affairs
What keywords are associated?
Standing Army
Civil Liberties
Non Intercourse Law
Washington
Napoleon
Administration Critique
What entities or persons were involved?
Washington
Hamilton
Napoleon
Secretary
U. States Armed Force
Great Britain
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Using Standing Army For Civil Enforcement
Stance / Tone
Strongly Critical Of Administration
Key Figures
Washington
Hamilton
Napoleon
Secretary
U. States Armed Force
Great Britain
Key Arguments
Using Standing Army For Civil Laws Was Once Seen As Odious And Dangerous To Liberties
Past Leaders Like Washington And Hamilton Were Not Foreign Influenced
Current Administration, Once Opposed, Now Recommends Military Enforcement Of Non Intercourse Law
This Imitates Napoleon's Methods