Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Lancaster Daily Intelligencer
Story March 21, 1888

Lancaster Daily Intelligencer

Lancaster, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

What is this article about?

James W. Tate, Kentucky's state treasurer for 20 years, embezzled state funds and fled in disgrace, sparking national conversation. As a Democrat, his fall underscores the need for vigilance in trusted positions.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

The Kentucky Defaulter.

Kentucky, and not Philadelphia, this time furnishes a defaulter big enough to make a topic of national conversation, and he is none other than James W. Tate, the treasurer of the state. Like all scoundrels of his class, he enjoyed an unimpaired and unimpeached reputation. He had occupied the office for twenty years, and his tenure was so long and his security from prying eyes so great that he made the usual mistake of supposing that the funds of the state were his own property.

The defaulter this time is a Democrat, which makes the weight of his offending all the greater. The first Democratic requisite for office is honesty. Without this foundation, capability and devotion to the constitution are as nothing. The office to which Tate had arisen in the state made his fall all the greater. When he was last a candidate for office, he was without opposition. His flight in disgrace after a long career of honorable service proves anew that in positions of trust the best men need the most watching.

What sub-type of article is it?

Crime Story Deception Fraud

What themes does it cover?

Crime Punishment Deception Fortune Reversal

What keywords are associated?

Defaulter Embezzlement Kentucky Treasurer James W Tate Democrat Scandal

What entities or persons were involved?

James W. Tate

Where did it happen?

Kentucky

Story Details

Key Persons

James W. Tate

Location

Kentucky

Story Details

James W. Tate, Kentucky state treasurer for 20 years, embezzled state funds after a long reputable career, fled in disgrace as a Democrat, highlighting the irony and need for oversight in trusted positions.

Are you sure?