Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
October 20, 1872
New Orleans Republican
New Orleans, Orleans County, Louisiana
What is this article about?
The editorial responds to the Opelousas Journal's criticism of Bourbons treating colored voters with whisky for political gain, agreeing on discouraging bribery but arguing for equal application to white voters and defending social drinking customs.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The Opelousas Journal notes as one of the indisputable signs of progress that the Bourbons of St. Landry now take their whisky straight with the colored voters. But the Journal does not approve the practice, and threatens to tell all it knows, or may find out about it. Our up country neighbor is partly right, and in a measure wrong in his strictures. He is right in discouraging the habit of treating and drinking for the purpose of securing political influence. Worthy candidates do not resort to this practice because they know they could not secure the confidence and support, of the good voters by such cheap bribery. But there is no objection to treating negroes with whisky for the purpose of getting their votes that can not be applied with equal force to treating white men for the same purpose. If two or more gentlemen desire to refresh themselves in each other's company, and, according to American custom, with one of the party to act as the host of the occasion, and the others as his guests, we can see no political offense in it, even though friendships thus begun lead finally to political support; and we must, in conceding a right to the enjoyment of this custom, at the same time concede the social right of each man to choose his friends on such occasions. Men usually form their social connections according to their tastes or whims—sometimes according to their prejudices—but so long as mutual gratification is the motive it is an arrangement with which the public have no concern. It is not always the case, and never, strictly speaking, quite correct in morals to indulge in drinking whisky on convivial occasions, though the custom is more general than it ought to be. If the Journal man exposes all the candidates who attempt to capture voters by plying them with country whisky it will simply discharge its duty, but if it confines itself to those who only attack the colored voters in this insidious manner it will but partially do its work, and let the greatest offenders escape. We are not hopeful that our contemporary will be strictly impartial in its new crusade against whisky drinking.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Temperance
Moral Or Religious
What keywords are associated?
Political Treating
Whisky Bribery
Colored Voters
Voter Influence
Social Customs
Impartial Crusade
What entities or persons were involved?
Opelousas Journal
Bourbons Of St. Landry
Colored Voters
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Political Treating With Whisky To Influence Voters
Stance / Tone
Balanced Criticism Advocating Impartiality In Condemning The Practice
Key Figures
Opelousas Journal
Bourbons Of St. Landry
Colored Voters
Key Arguments
Discouraging Treating And Drinking To Secure Political Influence Is Right, As Worthy Candidates Avoid Such Bribery.
No Objection To Treating Negroes With Whisky For Votes That Does Not Apply Equally To Treating White Men.
Social Refreshment Among Gentlemen, Even Leading To Political Support, Is Not A Political Offense.
Men Choose Social Connections By Taste Or Prejudice, A Private Matter If Mutually Gratifying.
Drinking Whisky On Convivial Occasions Is Not Always Morally Correct, Though Common.
Exposing Candidates Who Ply Voters With Whisky Discharges Duty, But Must Be Impartial To All Races.