Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeNew Hampshire Statesman And Concord Register
Concord, Merrimack County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
In Boston, the libel trial of Commonwealth vs. Theodore Lyman Jr. for a publication derogatory to Mr. Webster resulted in a hung jury yesterday, with the jury discharged after failing to agree, necessitating a new trial. The defense argued the piece aimed to attack Mr. Adams, not disrespect Mr. Webster.
OCR Quality
Full Text
It is understood that ten of the jury were for convicting, and two for acquitting; or, as others say, one for acquitting the defendant, and one hesitating. We intend to publish the substance of the trial to-morrow or on Saturday. In the mean time it may be stated that the question simply was, whether, upon a fair construction, the publication contained any thing derogatory to the character of Mr. Webster. The defendant's counsel insisted that it was not the defendant's object to speak of Mr. Webster, in the piece complained of, with the least disrespect, but that the design was solely to attack Mr. Adams.—Boston Courier of Thursday.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Boston
Event Date
Yesterday
Key Persons
Outcome
jury discharged without agreement; ten reportedly for convicting, two for acquitting; another trial required.
Event Details
The case of the Commonwealth vs. Theodore Lyman, jun. for a libel on Mr. Webster was committed to the jury yesterday at one o'clock. The jury returned in the afternoon, unable to agree, and informed the Judge of no probability of agreement. After consultation between counsel, the jury was discharged. The question was whether the publication contained anything derogatory to Mr. Webster's character. The defendant's counsel insisted the object was not to disrespect Mr. Webster but to attack Mr. Adams.