Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Alexandria Daily Advertiser
Editorial June 20, 1806

Alexandria Daily Advertiser

Alexandria, Virginia

What is this article about?

Criticism of William Duane's 1802-3 Aurora declarations opposing federalists, arguing such opposition achieves nothing and should be abandoned if based on patronage rather than principles.

Clipping

OCR Quality

75% Good

Full Text

Some time in the year 1802 or 3, Duane published in his Aurora the following declaration:

"If federalists are continued in office what in the name of God, have we been contending for?"

Every intelligent unprejudiced man, in the community replied at once. Nothing, nothing Monsieur Duane, ever.

The same Duane, in the course of some observations on the probability of the federalists again coming into power, gives the following discourse:

"If a contest with the federal party from the commencement of the government [mind, reader, when Washington was at the head of your government.] If a steady and unceasing opposition to its measures with than to put places and patronage opposition to federalism, then indeed Federalism in the hands of men possessing principles that opposition dishonorable, and as such ought now to be abandoned—

Fed."

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Duane Aurora Federalists Opposition Patronage Principles

What entities or persons were involved?

Duane Aurora Federalists Washington

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Criticism Of Duane's Opposition To Federalists

Stance / Tone

Critical Of Anti Federalist Stance

Key Figures

Duane Aurora Federalists Washington

Key Arguments

Opposition To Federalists Achieves Nothing Intelligent Men See No Gains From Anti Federalist Contention Opposition Based On Patronage Rather Than Principles Is Dishonorable Such Opposition Should Be Abandoned

Are you sure?