Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe New Hampshire Gazette And Historical Chronicle
Portsmouth, Greenland, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
General Conway dismissed from service after voting with the minority in Parliament on a key issue regarding seizure of private papers. Thetford Corporation praises his integrity in a letter dated April 28, 1764. Reports of further intended dismissals of officers who opposed the government.
Merged-components note: Merged sequential components on page 1 related to General Conway's dismissal from his regiment, including news reports, a supportive letter from the Corporation of Thetford, and a related epigram; overall topic is foreign political news.
OCR Quality
Full Text
We hear that a certain General officer, who was lately turned out of his regiment, and who is adored by the army for his bravery, humanity and integrity, has begged of all his friends not to express the least murmur or dissatisfaction on his account, as he is content with having served his country in his profession, and in Parliament, without enjoying the smallest gratuity.--A rare example of moderation, virtue and disinterestedness, May it be imitated!
The following letter was sent by the Corporation of Thetford to General Conway:
To Lieutenant General Conway.
"We the Mayor, Aldermen, and Corporation of Thetford, desire to return you our most unfeigned and grateful thanks, for your late spirited, conscientious, and unbiased conduct . parliament ; particularly on that most important question to the liberties of us all, the seizure of private papers by the warrant of a Secretary of State; a question which remaining undecided, must make every Englishman tremble ; and which, till declared to be illegal, leaves the glorious revolution imperfect.
Your behaviour, Sir, on that occasion was worthy of the unblemished integrity, which you have always manifested. Superior to bribes or menaces, you have demonstrated your civil courage to be equal to your military; you have fought the battles of your country against domestic and foreign enemies.
We know your services ; and we have heard that they were particularly. recommended to favour by that great judge of martial merit, Prince Ferdinand. These honours,.: Sir, cannot be taken from you. Some sorts of rewards may be envied you by selfish and designing ministers, who may know that you scorn to support unconstitutional measures ; but your country (and may it continue !) this free country, in whose cause you have fought from the noblest and most disinterested motives, will join in conferring thc best o. rewards--its applause.' There are seasons, when it would be a disgrace not to be. disgraced. Continue to act as you have done ; and may every borough in the kingdom be as worthily represented as the corporation of Thetford. Dated at our Guildhall, this 28th of April, 1764."
It has been' reported that there was an intention of. dismissing five more General Officers. Lord A--, Lord C-a-, Sir J: G--, Gen.Ha+-, Gen. F- And of carrying on t.he spirit of Dismissing, even down o low as Sir A-i-Gta-: he having also voted with the Minority upon one Question.
EPIGRAM.
They quite mistake brave Conway's Case,
Who thinks his Treatment hard ;
Where Service planly's a Disgrace,
Dismiss ion's a Reward.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
Thetford
Event Date
28th Of April, 1764
Key Persons
Outcome
dismissal of general conway and potential dismissal of five more general officers for voting with the minority
Event Details
General Conway received his letter of dismission on the day Parliament was prorogued after voting with the Minority on the question of seizure of private papers by warrant of a Secretary of State. The Corporation of Thetford sent a letter praising his conduct and integrity. Reports of intentions to dismiss additional officers who voted with the Minority.