Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Alexandria Gazette & Daily Advertiser
Foreign News October 20, 1817

Alexandria Gazette & Daily Advertiser

Alexandria, Virginia

What is this article about?

The London Star disproves reports of a Russia-mediated treaty binding maritime powers to suppress Spanish colonies in South America. The article concurs, stating that the colonies' independence would enhance Europe's wealth, particularly Britain's, more than colonial possession.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

The London Star, a most intelligent and independent paper, has disproved, from the very terms of the report itself, the assertion that a treaty had been carried into effect under the mediation of Russia, binding the maritime powers to join in concert to effect the submission of the Spanish colonies.

We agree with that judicious print that any such interference would be gross impolicy; for we think that there is not in Euclid a proposition more demonstrable than this, that the liberation of South America would tend to the augmentation of the wealth of the nations of Europe more than any other that can happen. In effect the emancipation and independence of that rich portion of the globe would be more to the advantage of Great Britain herself than the possession of it in colonial tenure; and it would give a new and a permanent spur to the industry, the enterprise, and the intellectual pursuits of the whole civilized world.

What sub-type of article is it?

Diplomatic Colonial Affairs Economic

What keywords are associated?

Russia Mediation Spanish Colonies South America Independence Maritime Powers Treaty European Wealth Augmentation

Where did it happen?

South America

Foreign News Details

Primary Location

South America

Outcome

disproof of the treaty assertion; argued benefits of south american independence for european wealth

Event Details

The London Star disproves, from the report's terms, the claim of a Russia-mediated treaty binding maritime powers to submit Spanish colonies. The article agrees such interference is impolitic, asserting South America's liberation would augment Europe's wealth more than any event, benefiting Britain beyond colonial possession and spurring global industry and enterprise.

Are you sure?