Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Jenks's Portland Gazette
Editorial May 31, 1802

Jenks's Portland Gazette

Portland, Cumberland County, Maine

What is this article about?

Editorial critiques a Democratic-majority committee for detailed scrutiny of Timothy Pickering's public fund uses under Washington and Adams, while minimally addressing Edmund Randolph's larger private expenditures, attributing the disparity to partisan bias favoring Democrats.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

The very delicate committee of Investigation—a majority of whom were pure democrats—are very eloquent and lucid, when detailing the pretended misapplications of Mr. Secretary Pickering, though they are necessitated, against the grain, to acknowledge, that the whole of the Sum was expended by him on subjects of a public nature: Yet the same verbose Committee when stating the scandalous peculation of Mr. Secretary Randolph to the amount of near SIXTY THOUSAND Dollars, spent for private purposes, laconically dismiss the subject, by merely saying, "that a suit not yet decided, has been instituted against Mr. Randolph, formerly Secretary of State, for a balance unaccounted for, by him." -But Mr. Pickering was a friend to the Washington and Adams administrations: -and Mr. Randolph was always a violent democrat--an intriguer with Citizen Fauchet: and is a friend of the present order of things— "And that accounts for it."

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Partisan Bias Government Investigation Pickering Randolph Democrats Public Funds Peculation

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Secretary Pickering Mr. Secretary Randolph Washington And Adams Administrations Citizen Fauchet

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Partisan Bias In Investigation Of Secretaries Pickering And Randolph

Stance / Tone

Critical Of Democratic Committee's Favoritism

Key Figures

Mr. Secretary Pickering Mr. Secretary Randolph Washington And Adams Administrations Citizen Fauchet

Key Arguments

Committee Eloquently Details Pickering's Expenditures But Admits They Were Public Committee Briefly Notes Randolph's Larger Private Spending And Ongoing Suit Disparity Due To Pickering's Ties To Federalist Administrations And Randolph's Democratic Affiliations

Are you sure?