Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
The Providence News
Providence, Providence County, Rhode Island
What is this article about?
In Supreme Court, plaintiffs James Beggs & Co. petition for new trial against James Hanley Brewing Co. over disputed $766.75 payment for McClave steam system installation, claiming fulfillment of contract; defendant alleges implied warranty breach in steam production.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
OF HANLEY BREWING CO. CASE
In the supreme court today there were arguments made on the plaintiff's petition for a new trial in the case of James Beggs & company against the James Hanley Brewing company which case was heard by Mr. Justice Dubois in the old appellate branch of the supreme court.
Plaintiffs assert that they agreed that there was a simple proposal made in writing to the defendant for the installing in its brewery of the McClave system for producing steam. This proposal was accepted by telegraph and plaintiffs installed the system and thereupon demanded payment of $766.75 the agreed upon price. Defendant claimed that there was an implied warranty beyond the express terms of the proposal accepted.
At the trial of the case James Hanley said that fine anthracite coal would not produce, though in the contract there was a statement that the apparatus was "adapted for the burning of fine anthracite coal, enough steam to operate important departments of the brewery the first defect noticed being a failure to furnish steam enough to start the ice making machine.
The plaintiff's counsel argued today that his clients had done all they agreed to do.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Domestic News Details
Event Date
Today
Key Persons
Event Details
Arguments made on the plaintiff's petition for a new trial in the case of James Beggs & company against the James Hanley Brewing company, heard by Mr. Justice Dubois. Plaintiffs assert agreement on a proposal to install the McClave steam system, accepted by telegraph, installed, and demanded payment of $766.75. Defendant claimed implied warranty beyond express terms. At trial, James Hanley stated fine anthracite coal would not produce enough steam as per contract statement. Plaintiff's counsel argued clients fulfilled agreement.