Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeSouthern Planter
Woodville, Wilkinson County, Mississippi
What is this article about?
In a Senate debate on the Bank Bill, Mr. Tazewell exposes Mr. Clay's inconsistency by citing Clay's prior view that such a charter violates the Constitution, silencing the presidential candidate as Mr. Webster intervenes.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Mr. Tazewell retorted triumphantly, and put the rash candidate to silence and confusion. He asked whether the sedition law was not unconstitutional, and therefore good proof that majorities had violated the paper guarantee, and he inquired whether he had not published authority of Mr. Clay himself, given not many years since, of saying that the passage of a Bank Charter, such as Mr. C. is now advocating is "a plain and palpable violation of the constitution; and consequently a violation of the highest paper guarantee."
The champion of monopolies of all sorts convicted out of his own mouth sat dumb, incapable of speech or reply, while Mr. Webster made a diversion in his favor, to turn away the attention of the Senate from his embarrassment.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Story Details
Key Persons
Location
The Senate
Event Date
A Few Days Since
Story Details
Mr. Clay attacks Mr. Tazewell's opinion on paper guarantees but is rebuked by his own past statement calling a Bank Charter a constitutional violation, leaving him silenced while Mr. Webster diverts attention.