Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Lewisburg Chronicle
Editorial June 12, 1850

Lewisburg Chronicle

Lewisburg, Union County, Pennsylvania

What is this article about?

The editorial explores Christianity's moral/social and spiritual dimensions, emphasizing both are essential. It critiques orthodox believers lacking virtue and virtuous individuals with false faith foundations, deeming the latter nobler but both deficient, urging balanced Christian charity.

Merged-components note: The second component is a direct continuation of the first editorial on Christianity's doctrines and duties, with seamless topical flow and sequential reading order.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Christianity has doctrines and duties which relate particularly to our fellow beings, which form its moral and social side; and it has doctrines and duties which relate particularly to God, which form its spiritual side, and comprehend directly whatever relates to our personal salvation. These together form its completeness.

It can not be truly embraced without embracing both. It is possible, however, to embrace its social and moral side alone, and to exhibit herein great beauty of character; like the young ruler who propounded to our Savior the important question, "Good Master, what good thing shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?" It is possible, also, to embrace its spiritual side alone, as far as the profession of a creed is concerned.

Now there are many men, who, owing to the fortunate circumstances of their education, are the stern believers in an orthodox creed, while violating every beautiful charity of life. And these men claim to themselves great merit for their dogmatic faith, although it be a "faith without works."

There are other men, who, owing, perhaps, to the equally unfortunate circumstances of their education, are building on a false foundation their hopes of eternal life, while distinguished for amiable tempers, and a generous and efficient morality in the ordinary walks of life.

It would be an unwise preference which should attach us in kinder bonds to the former than to the latter. The one has faith without virtue. The other has virtue without faith. The one professes to believe according to the most orthodox standard, but breathes no atmosphere of holiness. The other believes at least in social virtue, and is true to his belief. The last is the finer and nobler character. Both are essentially deficient.
Christian Charity will estimate their defects impartially; and will neither allow herself to be imposed upon by the proud assumption of unproductive orthodoxy, nor to be led away from the just proportion and momentous value of the spiritual side of religion, by those kindly virtues which she prizes, but which, nevertheless, when they stand lone, show that one thing still is wanting.—[N.Y. Evangelist.

What sub-type of article is it?

Moral Or Religious

What keywords are associated?

Christianity Faith Virtue Morality Spirituality Orthodoxy Charity

What entities or persons were involved?

Young Ruler Our Savior N.Y. Evangelist

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Balance Between Moral/Social And Spiritual Sides Of Christianity

Stance / Tone

Advocates Embracing Both Aspects; Prefers Virtue Without Faith Over Faith Without Virtue But Sees Both As Deficient

Key Figures

Young Ruler Our Savior N.Y. Evangelist

Key Arguments

Christianity Comprises Moral/Social And Spiritual Sides, Both Essential For Completeness Possible To Embrace Moral Side Alone, Showing Beauty Of Character Like The Young Ruler Possible To Profess Spiritual Creed Without True Embrace Orthodox Believers Often Lack Charity, Having Faith Without Works Virtuous Individuals May Build Hopes On False Foundations Due To Education Unwise To Prefer Faith Without Virtue Over Virtue Without Faith Virtue Without Faith Is Nobler Character Both Types Are Deficient Christian Charity Should Impartially Assess Defects, Valuing Spiritual Side Alongside Virtues

Are you sure?