Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Idaho Semi Weekly World
Story July 17, 1891

Idaho Semi Weekly World

Idaho City, Boise County, Idaho

What is this article about?

In 1891, Marion Harland satirizes dress reform advocates, arguing that implementing their suggestions—like divided skirts and heelless shoes—would eliminate topics for essayists and jobs for workers in the apparel industry.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Dire Results of Dress Reform.

It would be curiously interesting to inquire what has modified the "evils" of our grandmothers' toilets into the tolerably sensible apparel worn by women in this year of 1891. Perhaps the interminable crusade of newspaper and science journal essayists. Imagination staggers at the effort to picture the direful dearth of topics that would afflict these wordy philanthropists were the whole race of American women to put into practical operation their suggested dress reforms.

If we were simultaneously and dutifully to adopt divided skirts, broad, heelless shoes combination garments of sanitary flannel, loose waists with never an artificial bone or brace beneath them, short skirts, few in number, hung from the shoulders, and wide brimmed hats, if were to eschew veils, gloves, jet trimmings and crepe, do all things which our censors enjoin, and leave undone all they condemn, the occupation of hundreds of excellent bread winners and paragraph makers would be gone.—Marion Harland in Philadelphia Times.

What sub-type of article is it?

Curiosity

What themes does it cover?

Social Manners

What keywords are associated?

Dress Reform Women Apparel Fashion Critique Satire Philadelphia Times

What entities or persons were involved?

Marion Harland

Where did it happen?

America

Story Details

Key Persons

Marion Harland

Location

America

Event Date

1891

Story Details

Satirical commentary suggesting that full adoption of proposed dress reforms by American women would deprive newspaper essayists and workers of their occupations.

Are you sure?