Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Worcester Daily Spy
Domestic News March 8, 1858

Worcester Daily Spy

Worcester, Worcester County, Massachusetts

What is this article about?

Long-running lawsuit Gilbert Grippen vs. Western Railroad Company decided in defendant's favor after three hung juries since 1855. Grippen sought $5,000 for leg broken when train allegedly scared his horse at East Lanesboro' crossing without warning.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

An Old Railroad Case Decided.—The Greenfield Gazette states that the case of Gilbert Grippen vs. Western Railroad Company, which has been in Court since the October term of 1855, was decided on Saturday last, by verdict for the defendant. On three previous trials the jury disagreed. The plaintiff claimed damages to the amount of $5,000, alleging that he was riding at a moderate pace towards the railroad crossing on North Adams Railroad, at East Lanesboro', the train came along rapidly, no whistle blown, no bell rung, frightened his horse which ran away, and overturned his wagon, throwing him out and breaking his leg. The Railroad Company maintained that the train was going at a moderate speed, bell was rung, all reasonable caution observed; but that plaintiff recklessly attempted to cross the track before the engine.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court Accident Transportation

What keywords are associated?

Railroad Case Grippen Vs Western Railroad Horse Frightened Wagon Overturn Broken Leg Court Verdict

What entities or persons were involved?

Gilbert Grippen Western Railroad Company

Where did it happen?

East Lanesboro'

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

East Lanesboro'

Event Date

Saturday Last

Key Persons

Gilbert Grippen Western Railroad Company

Outcome

verdict for the defendant; plaintiff broke his leg

Event Details

The case of Gilbert Grippen vs. Western Railroad Company, in court since the October term of 1855, was decided by verdict for the defendant after three previous trials where the jury disagreed. The plaintiff claimed $5,000 damages, alleging he was riding at a moderate pace towards the railroad crossing when the train came rapidly without whistle or bell, frightening his horse, causing it to run away, overturn the wagon, and throw him out, breaking his leg. The company maintained the train was at moderate speed, bell rung, reasonable caution observed, but plaintiff recklessly attempted to cross before the engine.

Are you sure?