Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeRichmond Enquirer
Richmond, Richmond County, Virginia
What is this article about?
Delaware's U.S. Senators N. Vandyke and O. Horsey, and Representative L. M. Lane explain in a letter their dissent from the state legislature's resolution supporting restrictions on slavery in Missouri's admission to the Union, arguing Congress lacks such constitutional power.
OCR Quality
Full Text
It is known to our readers that both of the Senators, and one of the two members of the House of Representatives from the State of Delaware, dissent from the opinions expressed by the Legislature of that state, in regard to the Missouri Question. Two of these gentlemen have, in their places in Congress, ably at least, if not successfully, vindicated the course they have adopted, and to that defence will their constituents doubtless look for their justification: but, as representatives placed, by a conscientious discharge of their duty, in this responsible and unpleasant attitude of disobeying the expressed will of their constituents, on a question of great moment, we deem it but just to afford them every facility in making their motives known. It is with pleasure, therefore, that we insert the following letter, a copy of which has been put into our hands :
[Not Lat.]
WASHINGTON, FEB. 12.
Sir:—We have received a copy of the resolution passed by the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Delaware, on 6th January last, declaring "That it is, in the opinion of the General Assembly, the constitutional right of the United States, in Congress assembled, to enact and establish as one of the conditions for the admission of a new state into the Union, a provision which shall effectually prevent the further introduction of slavery into such state: and that a due regard to the true interests of such state as well as of the other states, requires that the same should be done."
That expression of the opinion of the legislature, upon the important question now under discussion in Congress, connected with the proposed admission of Missouri, as a new state, into the Union, has been considered, with all that deference and respectful attention to which it is justly entitled. The most deliberate examination of the subject, connected with the constitution of the United States and the treaty of cession by which that territory was acquired, has resulted in a sincere and firm conviction in our minds, that Congress does not possess the power to impose such a restriction upon the people of Missouri, in the formation of their state constitution. It would certainly be more gratifying to us to vote on this or any other question conformably to the opinion of the legislature, if we could do so consistently with a conscientious discharge of duty; but under our present conviction that it is not in our power in this instance, we trust that the legislature, in their candor will duly appreciate our motives in the discharge of a painful duty, and that we shall stand excused for expressing an opinion upon the subject different from that stated in the resolution.
We have the honour to be, very respectfully, sir, your most obedient servants,
N. VANDYKE,
O. HORSEY.
L. M. LANE.
Caleb Rodney, Esq. Speaker of the Senate of the State of Delaware.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Delaware
Event Date
Feb. 12
Key Persons
Outcome
the representatives express hope that the legislature will appreciate their motives and excuse their differing opinion on the missouri question.
Event Details
Delaware's U.S. Senators N. Vandyke and O. Horsey, and Representative L. M. Lane send a letter to Caleb Rodney, Speaker of the Delaware Senate, explaining their dissent from the state legislature's January 6 resolution supporting congressional restrictions on slavery for Missouri's statehood, arguing that Congress lacks the constitutional power to impose such conditions.